Home > Talkback
Features

Viewing comments for:

WTC Claims Dispute, $7.1 Billion at Stake

Features • September 2, 2002
Despite recent court ordered settlement procedures, the legal dispute pitting Swiss Re and 21 other insurance companies against Silverstein Properties, the master leaseholder on the twin towers of ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: RE: WTC Towers Structural Failure Analysis

Posted On: January 14, 2006, 7:54 pm CST
Posted By: ann
Comment:
why hasn't controlled demolition been considered more in the collapse of these buildings? Judging from what we've seen of buildings around the country being imploded, these collapse have all the earmarks of being wired with explosives.
Why was spoliation of evidence allowed, when buildings were exploded and their remains were immediately hauled off and melted away in a foreign country. Who represents the insurance investors whose billions of dollars are being illegally transferred to the greatest criminals of our century just past?
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: WTC Towers Structural Failure Analysis Orin
Jul 10, 2006, 9:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: WTC Towers Structural Failure Analysis ann
Jan 14, 2006, 7:54 pm
RE: RE: WTC Towers Structural Failure Analysis Frank Greer
Nov 14, 2004, 5:03 pm
RE: WTC Towers Structural Failure Analysis Mr. Marian Augustyniak
Oct 14, 2004, 8:00 pm
WTC Towers Structural Failure Analysis Mr. Marian Augustyniak
Oct 14, 2004, 7:55 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.