East News
Viewing comments for:
N.Y. Bill Would Mandate Insurance for Dog Owners
East News April 22, 2004
New York State Assemblyman Peter M. Rivera has proposed requiring all dog owners in the state to carry liability insurance for their pets.
He has nicknamed his bill "Elijah's Law" for a ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| I NEED YOUR HELP AS SOON AS POSSABLE | TONY | May 2, 2006, 4:18 pm |
| RE: RE: Elijah's Law | Jose Martinez | Feb 20, 2006, 1:51 pm |
| Elijah's law | Baron's mom | Aug 18, 2005, 7:20 pm |
| RE: Elijah's Law | dANIEL MUNOZ | Jul 20, 2005, 9:10 pm |
| RE: Elijah's law | jess | Jun 5, 2005, 2:18 am |
| RE: NY Dog Insurance | stacy | Mar 2, 2005, 1:14 pm |
| RE: Who writes Dog Liability Insurance in NY? | Rich Bernstein | Feb 9, 2005, 8:06 am |
| RE: Who writes Dog Liability Insurance in NY? | Rich Bernstein | Feb 8, 2005, 7:25 pm |
| Who writes Dog Liability Insurance in NY? | Joanne | Jan 11, 2005, 7:06 pm |
| RE: elijah's law | David Yantz | Jan 7, 2005, 8:52 am |
| RE: Dog Attack Insurance | Edward & Thinda. Williams | Sep 25, 2004, 6:00 am |
| Dog Attack Insurance | Edward & Thinda. Williams | Sep 24, 2004, 6:21 pm |
| RE: NY Dog Insurance | kelley reece | Sep 6, 2004, 12:08 pm |
| Finally, mandatory dog liability insurance | Dangerous Dogs | May 25, 2004, 11:53 pm |
| RE: RE: Elijah' Law | Tim | May 18, 2004, 1:01 pm |
| Elijah's law | suzy hinchey | May 14, 2004, 8:59 am |
| RE: Elijah' Law | stewart | May 14, 2004, 5:46 am |
| Elijah' Law | Angelo | May 7, 2004, 10:30 am |
| Mandated Dog Insurance | Lydia Negron | May 3, 2004, 10:43 am |
| elijah's law | richard a. weinstein | Apr 30, 2004, 2:57 pm |
| RE: Houston | Garrett | Apr 29, 2004, 4:23 pm |
| Houston | Tommy | Apr 29, 2004, 1:10 pm |
| Simon Sez, or why insurance is not the solution | Greg | Apr 29, 2004, 8:35 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Elijah's Law | Garrett | Apr 28, 2004, 6:35 pm |
| Elijah's Law | Garrett | Apr 28, 2004, 6:21 pm |
| RE: Elijah's Law | Cheriee | Apr 27, 2004, 7:01 pm |
| Elijah's Law | Dawn Buxton Turin NY | Apr 27, 2004, 6:04 pm |
| RE: RE: Elijah's Law | no dog lover | Apr 27, 2004, 11:44 am |
| RE: Elijah's Law | Michelle | Apr 27, 2004, 10:49 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Elijah's Law | jay | Apr 26, 2004, 11:09 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Elijah's Law | pix duller | Apr 26, 2004, 10:41 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Elijah's Law | pix duller | Apr 26, 2004, 10:40 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Elijah's Law | peter prance | Apr 26, 2004, 10:38 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Elijah's Law | peter prance | Apr 26, 2004, 10:37 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Elijah's Law | sally rote | Apr 26, 2004, 10:35 pm |
| Elijah's law | SAM | Apr 26, 2004, 10:02 pm |
| ELIJAH'S LAW | SHERRI | Apr 26, 2004, 4:40 pm |
| RE: Elijah's Law | Micah G. | Apr 26, 2004, 3:45 pm |
| RE: Mandatory Dog Insurance | Tim | Apr 26, 2004, 2:56 pm |
| Elijah's Law | Carl Dalmata | Apr 26, 2004, 9:46 am |
| RE: Elijah's Law | Angela Gooszas | Apr 26, 2004, 8:39 am |
| Mandatory Dog Insurance | Diane | Apr 25, 2004, 9:06 pm |
| RE: RE: Elijah's Law | Jody Parry | Apr 25, 2004, 9:02 am |
| RE: RE: Elijah's Law | Magda L. Miranda | Apr 24, 2004, 3:46 pm |
| RE: Elijah's Law | jan | Apr 23, 2004, 7:21 pm |
| RE: Elijah's Law | Theresa | Apr 23, 2004, 3:55 pm |
| RE: Elijah's Law | Sue | Apr 23, 2004, 2:02 pm |
| NY Dog Insurance | Nick Shoop | Apr 23, 2004, 10:53 am |
| Elijah's Law | Richard | Apr 23, 2004, 8:09 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Elijah's Law | Dorothy Keesler | Apr 23, 2004, 8:02 am |
| Elijah's Law | Dan | Apr 22, 2004, 7:11 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Elijah's Law | Anne | Apr 22, 2004, 5:28 pm |
| Elijah's Law | amy | Apr 22, 2004, 4:27 pm |
| Reply to Sandy | Bill | Apr 22, 2004, 1:56 pm |
| Elijah's Law | Dorothy Kent | Apr 22, 2004, 1:54 pm |
| RE: Elijah's Law | Henry | Apr 22, 2004, 1:45 pm |
| RE: Elijah's Law | cheryl | Apr 22, 2004, 1:41 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Elijah's Law | Susan | Apr 22, 2004, 1:38 pm |
| Elijah's Law | Christine Uveges | Apr 22, 2004, 1:37 pm |
| RE: RE: Elijah's Law | gARY | Apr 22, 2004, 1:32 pm |
| RE: Elijah's Law | Barb | Apr 22, 2004, 1:08 pm |
| RE: RE: Elijah's Law | Sandy | Apr 22, 2004, 12:46 pm |
| Elijah's Law | Joann | Apr 22, 2004, 12:38 pm |
| Elijah's Law | Daniel | Apr 22, 2004, 12:30 pm |
| Elijah's Law | Nancy Korneliusen | Apr 22, 2004, 12:28 pm |
| RE: RE: Elijah's Law | Larry | Apr 22, 2004, 12:28 pm |
| RE: Elijah's Law | Marie | Apr 22, 2004, 12:02 pm |
| Elijah's Law | Nataly C. Adams | Apr 22, 2004, 11:27 am |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: Elijah's Law
Owning a dog is as american as apple pie. I have 2 doberman's and they are as gentle as can be. They would sooner urinate on your feet than bit you. As a responsible dog owner I make sure that my dogs are licensed and vet check yearly and vaccinated. As a responsible dog owner I have spent a lot of money taking my dogs to obedience class and they have blue ribbions to prove it. I don't have children; however, my dogs are my children. Six years ago when I had to put my 14 year old doberman to sleep
it almost killed me. For a dog owner that is the worst thing they'll ever have to do. I'm a nurse and I have never had to care for a inpatient that had been bitten by a dog. However, we admit and treat patients all the time for cat bits. By passing Elija's law there will be an overwhelming amount of dog owner who will no longer be able to afford to own a dog. This will place an increased burdened on the SPCA and local pounds. Dogs will be abandoned and allowed to run and we will have problems with farrel dog like we do farrel cats. Who's going to pay to clean up that mess. Dog's are pack animals and allowed to run this could become and even greater problem.
As a pack they may begin killing livestock to survive. I know that I speak for dog owners all over. It would be less painful to stab me throught the heart as to take my dogs away. If this proposal is passed I will no longer be able to afford to keep my dogs. I live for my dogs without them life wouldn't be worth living. There has to be a better solution to this problem and not at the expense of Man's Best Friend.