East News
Viewing comments for:
N.J. Lawyers Sue to Scrap Med-Mal Insurance Fee
East News January 30, 2005
The New Jersey Legislature could have seen this coming. It enacted a law requiring the state's lawyers, and many doctors, to pay $75 a year for three years to help doctors in high-risk specialties ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: Med-Mal Insurance Fee | Ellen | Feb 24, 2005, 7:18 am |
| Insurance companies have become the Good Guys. Luv It!! | EQUIPOSE | Feb 20, 2005, 6:03 pm |
| RE: RE: Med-Mal Insurance Fee | LR | Feb 19, 2005, 3:21 pm |
| RE: Med-Mal Insurance Fee | William | Feb 15, 2005, 8:17 pm |
| RE: Med-Mal Insurance Fee | Renee | Feb 1, 2005, 11:17 am |
| Med-Mal Insurance Fee | Bill Reid | Jan 31, 2005, 12:49 pm |
| Oh, too funny | Mike | Jan 31, 2005, 12:22 pm |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: Med-Mal Insurance Fee
$75 a year to an attorney, regardless of how incompetent, is little more than a lunch tab. Suddenly they're squeeling like stuck pigs when faced with having to "pay to play". I have two suggestions. First, $75. is a ridiculously small sum. I'd propose a 3% surcharge on all attorney earnings from medical malpractice settlements. This would amount to only a fraction of what the average doctor is forced to pay to protect themselves from these people. Second, I'd suggest doctors stop treating personal injury attorneys. Why help people who are out to destroy you for their own personal gain.
Of course we shouldn't delude ourselves into thinking the state legislature will do the right thing. How many of them are attorneys?