East News

Viewing comments for:

Calif. Consumer Advocate Rosenfield Urges Mass. to Repeal No-Fault, Make Other Auto Changes

East News • March 29, 2005
Massachusetts should repeal its no-fault law, end its reliance on uniform state-set rates, and remove the state antitrust exemption for auto insurers if it wants to improve its auto insurance ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Real Life Connections

Posted On: March 30, 2005, 12:43 pm CST
Posted By: Anonymous
Comment:
In addition to increasing Health Insurance rates, the repeal of No-Fault will leave the medically uninsured, under-insured, and can't afford the co-pay insureds worse off. There is no savings here. Just a transfer of cost from one place to the other. The $50 saved in overall auto insurance premiums will be spent ten times over by the people. We can't seem to get univeral health care, but at least let us keep our $8k coverage for auto accidents. I'll pay the $50 for the peace of mind for myself and everyone else out there. And remember, "fault" is not so clear cut. In fault states, it's your fault if you skid on ice, it's your fault if your car suffers a mechanical issue, it's your fault if you hit a branch in the road.....
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: Real Life Connections Stacey
Mar 31, 2005, 11:21 am
The Real Truth about Insurance Stacey
Mar 31, 2005, 11:07 am
Real Life Connections Anonymous
Mar 30, 2005, 12:43 pm
RE: COMMON SENSE matadco
Mar 30, 2005, 5:11 am
COMMON SENSE Winston
Mar 29, 2005, 11:17 pm
go back to california joe
Mar 29, 2005, 10:22 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.