East News
Viewing comments for:
FEMA, Insurers, Adjusters Charged in Md. Lawsuit by Isabel Flood Victims
East News June 9, 2005
More than 140 victims of the 2003 tropical storm Isabel are suing Homeland Security Undersecretary Michael Brown, David Maurstad, who runs the National Flood Insurance Program, 17 insurance ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: Isabel victim | No Longer HOmeless in Maryland | Mar 16, 2009, 6:55 am |
| RE: Isabel victim | William Cannon | Feb 4, 2009, 2:22 pm |
| Tad Balzar - Insurers and Adjusters Can Be Sued By You | Roger Poe | Aug 23, 2007, 11:52 am |
| RE: Insurer's Claim Underpayment and Profit Schemes | Tad Balzer | Mar 8, 2007, 1:25 pm |
| Get mad at the Big Dogs | Hurricane Sally Florida | Jul 14, 2006, 9:33 pm |
| Insurer's Claim Underpayment and Profit Schemes | Roger Poe | Jun 19, 2005, 1:22 pm |
| RE: RE: Flood Policy | Still Homeless In Maryland | Jun 17, 2005, 5:54 am |
| RE: Flood Policy | another victim | Jun 16, 2005, 10:19 pm |
| Living Hell | Jane Welsh | Jun 16, 2005, 10:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Flood Policy | One of Many Flood Victims | Jun 15, 2005, 10:59 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Flood Policy to readytomoveon | Still Homeless In Maryland | Jun 15, 2005, 8:22 am |
| Adjuster Proof of Loss | Joanne Kraft | Jun 14, 2005, 10:13 am |
| RE: RE: Flood Policy | readytomoveon | Jun 14, 2005, 8:29 am |
| RE: 2 billion? | Disgusted | Jun 13, 2005, 7:17 pm |
| RE: Flood Policy | Fred Gwynn | Jun 13, 2005, 3:53 pm |
| RE: RE: 2 billion? | Jack Pot | Jun 13, 2005, 6:37 am |
| walk in our shoes | battered isabel survivor | Jun 12, 2005, 11:05 am |
| RE: RE: 2 billion? | Still Homelss in Maryland | Jun 12, 2005, 9:13 am |
| Flood Policy | gao | Jun 11, 2005, 8:35 pm |
| Isabel victim | Homeless | Jun 11, 2005, 2:27 pm |
| Let Your Conscience Be Your Guide | Devastated and Homeless | Jun 11, 2005, 11:09 am |
| RE: 2 billion? "Jack Pot" comment--er.."Crack Pot" | NFIP VICTIM | Jun 11, 2005, 8:59 am |
| RE: RE: 2 billion? | Tom Moffett | Jun 11, 2005, 8:27 am |
| RE: 2 billion? | Motta | Jun 11, 2005, 5:25 am |
| Damages | Screwed and destroyed | Jun 10, 2005, 10:34 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: 2 billion? | Mark | Jun 10, 2005, 10:09 pm |
| RE: RE: 2 billion? | isabel_victim | Jun 10, 2005, 8:25 pm |
| RE: 2 billion? | justme | Jun 10, 2005, 5:20 pm |
| RE: 2 billion? | Fred Gwynn | Jun 10, 2005, 2:52 pm |
| RE: 2 billion? | Scott Romoser | Jun 10, 2005, 12:58 pm |
| 2 billion? | Jack Pot | Jun 10, 2005, 11:47 am |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: Flood Policy
I've read mine. The policy says "We insure you against all DIRECT PHYSICAL LOSS BY OR FROM FLOOD to the insured property". Under Coverage A - Building Property - "We cover your dwelling which includes - 2. Materials and supplies to be used in the constructing, altering or repairing the dwelling".
When the adjuster comes out, we are told that they only cover replacing 4 ft up of the drywall, and will only pay to paint that 4 ft. Is it right, in a replacement cost policy to leave the wall with a line going around the room 4 ft high, and a two tone paint job ???
There are many things that are not spelled out in the policy , that a policy owner is unaware of, until a loss. This isn't right and has to be changed.
Unfortunately it had to come to a lawsuit, it was a very difficult decision to file the suit. These have been very stressful times. If they had just paid me what my contractor estimated the work to be originally I would have been satisfied. Of course in the end it did cost more than that.
My first adjuster flat out told me not to file an ICC, even though I told him I already had the substantial damage letter from the county.
How the policies are written and given to the policy owners, and how they are adjusted are not equal.