East News
Viewing comments for:
FEMA, Insurers, Adjusters Charged in Md. Lawsuit by Isabel Flood Victims
East News • June 9, 2005
More than 140 victims of the 2003 tropical storm Isabel are suing Homeland Security Undersecretary Michael Brown, David Maurstad, who runs the National Flood Insurance Program, 17 insurance ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: Isabel victim | No Longer HOmeless in Maryland | Mar 16, 2009, 6:55 am |
| RE: Isabel victim | William Cannon | Feb 4, 2009, 2:22 pm |
| Tad Balzar - Insurers and Adjusters Can Be Sued By You | Roger Poe | Aug 23, 2007, 11:52 am |
| RE: Insurer's Claim Underpayment and Profit Schemes | Tad Balzer | Mar 8, 2007, 1:25 pm |
| Get mad at the Big Dogs | Hurricane Sally Florida | Jul 14, 2006, 9:33 pm |
| Insurer's Claim Underpayment and Profit Schemes | Roger Poe | Jun 19, 2005, 1:22 pm |
| RE: RE: Flood Policy | Still Homeless In Maryland | Jun 17, 2005, 5:54 am |
| RE: Flood Policy | another victim | Jun 16, 2005, 10:19 pm |
| Living Hell | Jane Welsh | Jun 16, 2005, 10:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Flood Policy | One of Many Flood Victims | Jun 15, 2005, 10:59 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Flood Policy to readytomoveon | Still Homeless In Maryland | Jun 15, 2005, 8:22 am |
| Adjuster Proof of Loss | Joanne Kraft | Jun 14, 2005, 10:13 am |
| RE: RE: Flood Policy | readytomoveon | Jun 14, 2005, 8:29 am |
| RE: 2 billion? | Disgusted | Jun 13, 2005, 7:17 pm |
| RE: Flood Policy | Fred Gwynn | Jun 13, 2005, 3:53 pm |
| RE: RE: 2 billion? | Jack Pot | Jun 13, 2005, 6:37 am |
| walk in our shoes | battered isabel survivor | Jun 12, 2005, 11:05 am |
| RE: RE: 2 billion? | Still Homelss in Maryland | Jun 12, 2005, 9:13 am |
| Flood Policy | gao | Jun 11, 2005, 8:35 pm |
| Isabel victim | Homeless | Jun 11, 2005, 2:27 pm |
| Let Your Conscience Be Your Guide | Devastated and Homeless | Jun 11, 2005, 11:09 am |
| RE: 2 billion? "Jack Pot" comment--er.."Crack Pot" | NFIP VICTIM | Jun 11, 2005, 8:59 am |
| RE: RE: 2 billion? | Tom Moffett | Jun 11, 2005, 8:27 am |
| RE: 2 billion? | Motta | Jun 11, 2005, 5:25 am |
| Damages | Screwed and destroyed | Jun 10, 2005, 10:34 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: 2 billion? | Mark | Jun 10, 2005, 10:09 pm |
| RE: RE: 2 billion? | isabel_victim | Jun 10, 2005, 8:25 pm |
| RE: 2 billion? | justme | Jun 10, 2005, 5:20 pm |
| RE: 2 billion? | Fred Gwynn | Jun 10, 2005, 2:52 pm |
| RE: 2 billion? | Scott Romoser | Jun 10, 2005, 12:58 pm |
| 2 billion? | Jack Pot | Jun 10, 2005, 11:47 am |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: Flood Policy
The poor faith efforts of the Adjustors, insurane companies, FEMA, Anne Arundel officials, building inspectors, etc. leaves two important questions:
1.) Has anyone had a decent Home or Building replacement experience with the flooding from Isabelle?
2.) And why are their only 140 particpants in this lawsuit? With the number of damaged Home structures and what seems to be a relatively comprehensive conspiracy to avoid full replacement and rebuild with like kind and quality, One would guess a great deal more people would be part of this lawsuit?