East News
Viewing comments for:
Firearm Manufacturers Target D.C. Strict Assault Weapon Liability Act
East News • July 20, 2005
Firearm manufacturers have filed papers asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review a District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruling permitting lawsuits against firearms manufacturers under the District ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Gun's don't kill people | Dumbfounded | Jul 22, 2005, 2:46 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Gun's don't kill people | Dave | Jul 22, 2005, 2:36 pm |
| RE: What's an assault weapon?? | MarkoG | Jul 22, 2005, 11:44 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Gun's don't kill people | S.E.Mettler | Jul 22, 2005, 9:55 am |
| What's an assault weapon?? | GDSVT | Jul 22, 2005, 7:57 am |
| guns don't kill people | gordo | Jul 21, 2005, 6:03 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Gun's don't kill people | Dumbfounded | Jul 21, 2005, 1:56 pm |
| RE: RE: Gun's don't kill people | Read Again | Jul 21, 2005, 1:51 pm |
| RE: Gun's don't kill people | GDSVT | Jul 21, 2005, 1:33 pm |
| Gun's don't kill people | Dumbfounded | Jul 21, 2005, 1:13 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: Gun's don't kill people
Last time I looked, it was in the Constitution that people have the right to bear arms. I have no intention of arguing that there shouldn't be some limits or restrictions on the type of weapons available to the general public. But unless the act of making a gun available to the individual directly causes them to go out and shoot somebody, how can the manufacturer be responsible?
Another point to ponder. Does the company that makes the BULLET have any responsibility in the matter? After all, a gun is pretty harmless without ammunition!