East News
Viewing comments for:
Firearm Manufacturers Target D.C. Strict Assault Weapon Liability Act
East News • July 20, 2005
Firearm manufacturers have filed papers asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review a District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruling permitting lawsuits against firearms manufacturers under the District ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Gun's don't kill people | Dumbfounded | Jul 22, 2005, 2:46 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Gun's don't kill people | Dave | Jul 22, 2005, 2:36 pm |
| RE: What's an assault weapon?? | MarkoG | Jul 22, 2005, 11:44 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Gun's don't kill people | S.E.Mettler | Jul 22, 2005, 9:55 am |
| What's an assault weapon?? | GDSVT | Jul 22, 2005, 7:57 am |
| guns don't kill people | gordo | Jul 21, 2005, 6:03 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Gun's don't kill people | Dumbfounded | Jul 21, 2005, 1:56 pm |
| RE: RE: Gun's don't kill people | Read Again | Jul 21, 2005, 1:51 pm |
| RE: Gun's don't kill people | GDSVT | Jul 21, 2005, 1:33 pm |
| Gun's don't kill people | Dumbfounded | Jul 21, 2005, 1:13 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: RE: RE: Gun's don't kill people
I also have no problems restricting access of assualt weapons to military and police as the general public should not need a weapon specifically designed for combat purposes.
That said, see my original point. Why should the manufacturer be held liable for the criminal acts of an individual? Build the laws according to the need (i.e. personal accountability for your actions), but do not punish those not responsible for the crime.