East News
Viewing comments for:
Gay Partner Can't Sue Hospital for Malpractice, N.Y. Appeals Court Rules
East News • October 13, 2005
A New York Appeals Court has ruled that the same sex partner of a man who died after surgery related to injuries suffered in a car accident does not have standing to sue the hospital for ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| Reply to mud | Banana | Oct 18, 2005, 10:23 am |
| RE: RE: RE: They wonder why..... | mud | Oct 18, 2005, 7:06 am |
| RE: RE: They wonder why..... | Gender Blind | Oct 18, 2005, 6:49 am |
| RE: They wonder why..... | Sympathetic | Oct 14, 2005, 3:59 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: They wonder why..... | Gender Blind | Oct 14, 2005, 3:22 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: They wonder why..... | MUD | Oct 14, 2005, 3:16 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: They wonder why..... | Gender Blind | Oct 14, 2005, 3:10 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: They wonder why..... | MUD | Oct 14, 2005, 3:01 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: They wonder why..... | Gender Blind | Oct 14, 2005, 2:56 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: They wonder why..... | Gender Blind | Oct 14, 2005, 2:51 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: They wonder why..... | mud | Oct 14, 2005, 2:50 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: They wonder why..... | Gender Blind | Oct 14, 2005, 2:41 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: They wonder why..... | mud | Oct 14, 2005, 2:41 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: They wonder why..... | Gender Blind | Oct 14, 2005, 2:27 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: They wonder why..... | mud | Oct 14, 2005, 2:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: They wonder why..... | mud | Oct 14, 2005, 2:02 pm |
| RE: RE: They wonder why..... | Gender Blind | Oct 14, 2005, 1:36 pm |
| RE: They wonder why..... | mud | Oct 14, 2005, 1:04 pm |
| They wonder why..... | Sympathetic | Oct 14, 2005, 12:12 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: They wonder why.....
I KNOW they don't have the right. I already agreed with you on that point. My point, if you would actually read, is that they don't have the right, meaning they are afforded LESS rights than I have right now. Giving them the same right to marriage would only put them on EQUAL footing, not give them special treatment.
Judges are there to interpret laws, and in many cases they have indeed overstepped their bounds to effectively legislate from the bench. I think Miranda is a lousy example because he wasn't afforded the opportunity to excercise his Constitutionally protected rights (hence the requirement that everyone now be informed of them), but I concede your point.