Home > Talkback
East News

Viewing comments for:

Pennsylvania Court Rules Parents' Homeowners Policy Covers Shootings by Son

East News • February 23, 2006
An insurance company might have to pay $1.8 million if the lone survivor and relatives of five other victims of a shooting spree win lawsuits against the attacker's parents, the Pennsylvania ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Negligence

Posted On: February 23, 2006, 12:28 pm CST
Posted By: debbie
Comment:
Seems to me that if the parents were found negligent, then they should be legally responsible; not the insurance company. The ones being punished for the negligence is the insurance company, how is that fair? I thought that the criminal acts of Insureds is excluded on all homeowner policies, not just the umbrellas. Of course, we all know that exclusions don't stand up in court when tested. Since the insurance companies obviously have money trees, let them just water them and keep paying. Totally unaccepable, but what can one do ???
Subject Posted By Posted On
Subrogate against the Bar Association Bill
Feb 28, 2006, 12:36 pm
Court ruling against parents home policy for murders stat guy
Feb 28, 2006, 7:23 am
RE: RE: Shootings Snake-in-the-grass
Feb 28, 2006, 7:02 am
RE: RE: RE: Coverage A Exclusion??? brian
Feb 27, 2006, 10:45 pm
RE: By this logic An Observer
Feb 27, 2006, 3:26 pm
RE: Shootings Dave from Arizona
Feb 27, 2006, 3:21 pm
RE: RE: Chris. Ruling against parents home policy for murder Chris
Feb 25, 2006, 11:29 am
RE: Chris. Ruling against parents home policy for murders. Othello Orson
Feb 24, 2006, 9:27 pm
RE: RE: RE: Court ruling against parents home policy for mur joe in claims
Feb 24, 2006, 3:13 pm
RE: RE: Court ruling against parents home policy for murders der writer!!!!
Feb 24, 2006, 11:24 am
RE: Court ruling against parents home policy for murders. Chris
Feb 24, 2006, 7:08 am
Court ruling against parents home policy for murders. Othello Orson
Feb 24, 2006, 3:42 am
RE: RE: Coverage A Exclusion??? Chris
Feb 23, 2006, 4:46 pm
RE: Coverage A Exclusion??? Brian
Feb 23, 2006, 4:35 pm
Coverage A Exclusion??? CPCU Guy 2006
Feb 23, 2006, 3:55 pm
RE: Shootings Dirk
Feb 23, 2006, 3:49 pm
RE: Son was shot Richard Heagle
Feb 23, 2006, 1:23 pm
RE: RE: Negligence Chris
Feb 23, 2006, 1:23 pm
Son was shot beenthere
Feb 23, 2006, 12:48 pm
RE: Negligence LLCJ
Feb 23, 2006, 12:37 pm
RE: Courts Bill K
Feb 23, 2006, 12:32 pm
Negligence debbie
Feb 23, 2006, 12:28 pm
RE: You're not stupid! You are not stupid
Feb 23, 2006, 12:26 pm
By this logic LLCJ
Feb 23, 2006, 12:23 pm
Ahead of the curve A Product Manager
Feb 23, 2006, 12:14 pm
You're not stupid! Richard Heagle
Feb 23, 2006, 11:53 am
Shootings Confused
Feb 23, 2006, 8:24 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.