East News
Viewing comments for:
Insurers Defend Job, Education as Auto Insurance Pricing Criteria in N.J.
East News June 13, 2006
Insurance industry representatives urged New Jersey lawmakers not to restrict insurers' use of certain rating variables including occupation and education in the pricing of auto insurance ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Poor vs Rich | Race | Jun 19, 2006, 10:27 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Poor vs Rich | bubba | Jun 16, 2006, 3:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Poor vs Rich | Race | Jun 15, 2006, 3:33 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Not Poor vs Rich | bubba | Jun 15, 2006, 9:46 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Poor vs Rich | Race Lost | Jun 14, 2006, 3:34 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Poor vs Rich | Race | Jun 14, 2006, 10:10 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Poor vs Rich | Greg | Jun 14, 2006, 9:31 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Poor vs Rich | Jen | Jun 14, 2006, 7:52 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Poor vs Rich | B | Jun 14, 2006, 7:25 am |
| RE: RE: Poor vs Rich | reader | Jun 13, 2006, 10:31 pm |
| RE: RE: Poor vs Rich | J IS RIGHT! | Jun 13, 2006, 8:56 pm |
| RE: Poor vs Rich | J is wrong | Jun 13, 2006, 5:17 pm |
| Poor vs Rich | J | Jun 13, 2006, 2:07 pm |
| Explainability of analytics is key | James Taylor | Jun 13, 2006, 12:27 pm |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Poor vs Rich
As for the comments questioning where was the uproar when gender was used in setting rates, it is my belief that there was no uproar because it was men who got charged higher rates. If the introduction of gender raised women's rates more than mens, I think there would have been quite a commotion.