East News

Viewing comments for:

N.J. High Court Rules Gays Entitled to Rights, Benefts of Marriage

East News • October 25, 2006
The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that the equal protection clause of the state's constitution requires that "committed same-sex couples must be afforded on equal terms the same rights and ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: Same Sex Marriage

Posted On: October 26, 2006, 3:12 pm CDT
Posted By: Bruce
Comment:
Religion has no part in government? "Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers." -John Jay, First Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court and co-author of the Federalist Papers, letter to Jedidiah Morse, 28 Feb 1797.

"Christianity becomes not merely an auxiliary, but a guide, to the law of nature; establishing its conclusions, removing its doubts, and evaluating its precepts." -Joseph Story, "The Value and Importance of Legal Studies," a lecture delivered August 25, 1829 at his inauguration as Dane Professor of Law in Harvard University, cited in James McClellan, Joseph Story and the American Constitution (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma, 1971), p. 66.

"Different religions, and/or beliefs are not bad, immoral, or corrupt they are just different." So then, everything's permitted. Once everything is permitted, then anything can be made mandatory.

You whine about "church and state," as if the man/woman marriage that has existed for the whole of recorded history is the result of any-sodomist bigotry, but have no qualms about one court overturning the most fundamental of human institutions.

At any rate, sodomists do not get married much in the European countries that have allowed it for years because they cannot control their promiscuous impulses, and see no reason to be tied to only one mate. The average homo has had hundreds of partners by the time he is thirty. Not even randy straight men are this incautious.

So "gay marriage" in NJ is not going to amount to much. Evil social movements have come and gone and left little lasting imprint.
Subject Posted By Posted On
Equal Rights for Gays Mmmmmmm
Oct 28, 2006, 11:12 am
RE: RE: RE: Still Going??? caveat emptor
Oct 27, 2006, 5:51 pm
RE: RE: Still Going??? caveat emptor
Oct 27, 2006, 5:50 pm
RE: RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? Heather
Oct 27, 2006, 4:12 pm
Agree or Disagree Mod Liberal
Oct 27, 2006, 4:07 pm
RE: RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? KLS
Oct 27, 2006, 3:56 pm
RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? Saddened Citizen
Oct 27, 2006, 3:30 pm
RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? sam
Oct 27, 2006, 3:28 pm
RE: RE: Still Going??? Mod Liberal
Oct 27, 2006, 2:52 pm
RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? Bruce
Oct 27, 2006, 2:22 pm
RE: Still Going??? Bruce
Oct 27, 2006, 2:03 pm
Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? KLS
Oct 27, 2006, 1:47 pm
Still Going??? Mod Liberal
Oct 27, 2006, 1:44 pm
RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage Bulldogg
Oct 27, 2006, 1:15 pm
RE: Uh, Bruce...I think there's a tilt here... Bruce
Oct 27, 2006, 12:30 pm
Uh, Bruce...I think there's a tilt here... Mmmmmmmmmm
Oct 27, 2006, 12:20 pm
RE: RE: RE: The Court Answered the ? before it...
Oct 27, 2006, 11:53 am
RE: RE: The Court Answered the ? before it... Bruce
Oct 27, 2006, 11:35 am
RE: The Court Answered the ? before it... .
Oct 27, 2006, 11:27 am
The Court Answered the ? before it... Mmmmmmm...
Oct 27, 2006, 11:00 am
The point is...
Oct 27, 2006, 10:39 am
RE: Same Sex Marriage Bruce
Oct 27, 2006, 7:57 am
Same Sex Marriage Mmmmmm.....
Oct 27, 2006, 7:14 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage
Oct 26, 2006, 5:59 pm
RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage Saddened Citizen
Oct 26, 2006, 5:43 pm
RE: RE: Eternal Damnation...
Oct 26, 2006, 5:23 pm
RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage bob laublaw
Oct 26, 2006, 5:21 pm
RE: "Democractic Process"?!?!?! Misty Meanor
Oct 26, 2006, 5:20 pm
RE: RE: RE: Why not, Bruce?
Oct 26, 2006, 5:13 pm
RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage
Oct 26, 2006, 4:58 pm
RE: Same Sex Marriage Offended
Oct 26, 2006, 4:54 pm
RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage .
Oct 26, 2006, 4:07 pm
As It Relates To Insurance Joe Agent
Oct 26, 2006, 3:53 pm
RE: Same Sex Marriage Bruce
Oct 26, 2006, 3:12 pm
"Democratic Process"?!?!?! Still Tired
Oct 26, 2006, 3:11 pm
RE: Same Sex Marriage Bulldogg
Oct 26, 2006, 3:08 pm
RE: RE: RE: Why not Bulldogg
Oct 26, 2006, 2:55 pm
Same Sex Marriage Mod Liberal
Oct 26, 2006, 2:54 pm
RE: Democratic Process Gregg Burns
Oct 26, 2006, 2:45 pm
RE: RE: RE: Why not Bruce
Oct 26, 2006, 2:23 pm
"Democratic Process"?!?!?! Bruce
Oct 26, 2006, 2:22 pm
RE: RE: Why not Jeanine
Oct 26, 2006, 2:19 pm
RE: RE: Why not, Bruce? Bruce
Oct 26, 2006, 2:13 pm
RE: RE: Why not, Bruce? Bulldogg
Oct 26, 2006, 1:57 pm
Liberal Left Tired of Anti Americans
Oct 26, 2006, 1:52 pm
RE: Why not, Bruce? T.C.
Oct 26, 2006, 1:47 pm
RE: RE: RE: Why not Bruce
Oct 26, 2006, 1:44 pm
RE: Eternal Damnation... Bruce
Oct 26, 2006, 1:41 pm
RE: Same Sex Marriage Silent Maj
Oct 26, 2006, 1:39 pm
RE: RE: Why not Tolerant Christian
Oct 26, 2006, 1:38 pm
Eternal Damnation... BLP
Oct 26, 2006, 1:24 pm
RE: Why not Bruce
Oct 26, 2006, 1:15 pm
RE: RE: Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage Bruce
Oct 26, 2006, 1:10 pm
Why not "married"?!? Confused
Oct 26, 2006, 1:04 pm
A step in the right direction! KLS
Oct 26, 2006, 12:20 pm
RE: RE: Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage Mr. P.
Oct 26, 2006, 11:35 am
RE: Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage .
Oct 26, 2006, 9:02 am
Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage Mmmm...
Oct 26, 2006, 7:23 am
RE: Same Sex Marriage
Oct 26, 2006, 12:34 am
Same Sex Marriage Unknown
Oct 25, 2006, 9:39 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.