East News
Viewing comments for:
N.J. High Court Rules Gays Entitled to Rights, Benefts of Marriage
East News October 25, 2006
The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that the equal protection clause of the state's constitution requires that "committed same-sex couples must be afforded on equal terms the same rights and ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| Equal Rights for Gays | Mmmmmmm | Oct 28, 2006, 11:12 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Still Going??? | caveat emptor | Oct 27, 2006, 5:51 pm |
| RE: RE: Still Going??? | caveat emptor | Oct 27, 2006, 5:50 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | Heather | Oct 27, 2006, 4:12 pm |
| Agree or Disagree | Mod Liberal | Oct 27, 2006, 4:07 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | KLS | Oct 27, 2006, 3:56 pm |
| RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | Saddened Citizen | Oct 27, 2006, 3:30 pm |
| RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | sam | Oct 27, 2006, 3:28 pm |
| RE: RE: Still Going??? | Mod Liberal | Oct 27, 2006, 2:52 pm |
| RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 2:22 pm |
| RE: Still Going??? | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 2:03 pm |
| Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | KLS | Oct 27, 2006, 1:47 pm |
| Still Going??? | Mod Liberal | Oct 27, 2006, 1:44 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bulldogg | Oct 27, 2006, 1:15 pm |
| RE: Uh, Bruce...I think there's a tilt here... | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 12:30 pm |
| Uh, Bruce...I think there's a tilt here... | Mmmmmmmmmm | Oct 27, 2006, 12:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: The Court Answered the ? before it... | Oct 27, 2006, 11:53 am |
|
| RE: RE: The Court Answered the ? before it... | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 11:35 am |
| RE: The Court Answered the ? before it... | . | Oct 27, 2006, 11:27 am |
| The Court Answered the ? before it... | Mmmmmmm... | Oct 27, 2006, 11:00 am |
| The point is... | Oct 27, 2006, 10:39 am |
|
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 7:57 am |
| Same Sex Marriage | Mmmmmm..... | Oct 27, 2006, 7:14 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Oct 26, 2006, 5:59 pm |
|
| RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Saddened Citizen | Oct 26, 2006, 5:43 pm |
| RE: RE: Eternal Damnation... | Oct 26, 2006, 5:23 pm |
|
| RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | bob laublaw | Oct 26, 2006, 5:21 pm |
| RE: "Democractic Process"?!?!?! | Misty Meanor | Oct 26, 2006, 5:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not, Bruce? | Oct 26, 2006, 5:13 pm |
|
| RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Oct 26, 2006, 4:58 pm |
|
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Offended | Oct 26, 2006, 4:54 pm |
| RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | . | Oct 26, 2006, 4:07 pm |
| As It Relates To Insurance | Joe Agent | Oct 26, 2006, 3:53 pm |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 3:12 pm |
| "Democratic Process"?!?!?! | Still Tired | Oct 26, 2006, 3:11 pm |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bulldogg | Oct 26, 2006, 3:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not | Bulldogg | Oct 26, 2006, 2:55 pm |
| Same Sex Marriage | Mod Liberal | Oct 26, 2006, 2:54 pm |
| RE: Democratic Process | Gregg Burns | Oct 26, 2006, 2:45 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 2:23 pm |
| "Democratic Process"?!?!?! | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 2:22 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not | Jeanine | Oct 26, 2006, 2:19 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not, Bruce? | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 2:13 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not, Bruce? | Bulldogg | Oct 26, 2006, 1:57 pm |
| Liberal Left | Tired of Anti Americans | Oct 26, 2006, 1:52 pm |
| RE: Why not, Bruce? | T.C. | Oct 26, 2006, 1:47 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:44 pm |
| RE: Eternal Damnation... | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:41 pm |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Silent Maj | Oct 26, 2006, 1:39 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not | Tolerant Christian | Oct 26, 2006, 1:38 pm |
| Eternal Damnation... | BLP | Oct 26, 2006, 1:24 pm |
| RE: Why not | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:15 pm |
| RE: RE: Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:10 pm |
| Why not "married"?!? | Confused | Oct 26, 2006, 1:04 pm |
| A step in the right direction! | KLS | Oct 26, 2006, 12:20 pm |
| RE: RE: Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | Mr. P. | Oct 26, 2006, 11:35 am |
| RE: Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | . | Oct 26, 2006, 9:02 am |
| Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | Mmmm... | Oct 26, 2006, 7:23 am |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Oct 26, 2006, 12:34 am |
|
| Same Sex Marriage | Unknown | Oct 25, 2006, 9:39 pm |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage
The fact is that throughout history, healthy societies universally recognized that man and woman are meant to live together in monogamous unions and raise children, i.e. a family. This simple truth corresponds to the human heart, be that heart American, European, Asian, Middle Eastern or African. Homosexual union, particularly gay marriage, does not.
It is one of society's (and government's) primary tasks to foster and encourage the family. Society has an interest in fostering families and even regulating conduct that affects the family (e.g. laws re educating and providing health care for children).
What the court has done has been to impose a homosexual agenda masquerading it in the guise of rights. While the Courts have done marvelous things to defend civil rights, that doesn't mean the court is right every time it seeks to impose an agenda. A rights argument can be fashioned to promote anything. We have to make judgments using our hearts and minds to decide what is best, not just for me, or for gays, but for our culture, our society, which ultimately means our future.
I for one am going to stand up for what has worked for the past 4,000 years, the family. Maybe some will threaten to assign me to history's trash heap of bigots, but I'm not worried about that. I'd rather take a stand for preserving society, marriage and the traditional family, because I believe, based on history and tradition, that gay marriage is simply wrong.