East News
Viewing comments for:
N.J. High Court Rules Gays Entitled to Rights, Benefts of Marriage
East News • October 25, 2006
The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that the equal protection clause of the state's constitution requires that "committed same-sex couples must be afforded on equal terms the same rights and ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| Equal Rights for Gays | Mmmmmmm | Oct 28, 2006, 11:12 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Still Going??? | caveat emptor | Oct 27, 2006, 5:51 pm |
| RE: RE: Still Going??? | caveat emptor | Oct 27, 2006, 5:50 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | Heather | Oct 27, 2006, 4:12 pm |
| Agree or Disagree | Mod Liberal | Oct 27, 2006, 4:07 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | KLS | Oct 27, 2006, 3:56 pm |
| RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | Saddened Citizen | Oct 27, 2006, 3:30 pm |
| RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | sam | Oct 27, 2006, 3:28 pm |
| RE: RE: Still Going??? | Mod Liberal | Oct 27, 2006, 2:52 pm |
| RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 2:22 pm |
| RE: Still Going??? | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 2:03 pm |
| Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | KLS | Oct 27, 2006, 1:47 pm |
| Still Going??? | Mod Liberal | Oct 27, 2006, 1:44 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bulldogg | Oct 27, 2006, 1:15 pm |
| RE: Uh, Bruce...I think there's a tilt here... | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 12:30 pm |
| Uh, Bruce...I think there's a tilt here... | Mmmmmmmmmm | Oct 27, 2006, 12:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: The Court Answered the ? before it... | Oct 27, 2006, 11:53 am |
|
| RE: RE: The Court Answered the ? before it... | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 11:35 am |
| RE: The Court Answered the ? before it... | . | Oct 27, 2006, 11:27 am |
| The Court Answered the ? before it... | Mmmmmmm... | Oct 27, 2006, 11:00 am |
| The point is... | Oct 27, 2006, 10:39 am |
|
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 7:57 am |
| Same Sex Marriage | Mmmmmm..... | Oct 27, 2006, 7:14 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Oct 26, 2006, 5:59 pm |
|
| RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Saddened Citizen | Oct 26, 2006, 5:43 pm |
| RE: RE: Eternal Damnation... | Oct 26, 2006, 5:23 pm |
|
| RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | bob laublaw | Oct 26, 2006, 5:21 pm |
| RE: "Democractic Process"?!?!?! | Misty Meanor | Oct 26, 2006, 5:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not, Bruce? | Oct 26, 2006, 5:13 pm |
|
| RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Oct 26, 2006, 4:58 pm |
|
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Offended | Oct 26, 2006, 4:54 pm |
| RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | . | Oct 26, 2006, 4:07 pm |
| As It Relates To Insurance | Joe Agent | Oct 26, 2006, 3:53 pm |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 3:12 pm |
| "Democratic Process"?!?!?! | Still Tired | Oct 26, 2006, 3:11 pm |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bulldogg | Oct 26, 2006, 3:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not | Bulldogg | Oct 26, 2006, 2:55 pm |
| Same Sex Marriage | Mod Liberal | Oct 26, 2006, 2:54 pm |
| RE: Democratic Process | Gregg Burns | Oct 26, 2006, 2:45 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 2:23 pm |
| "Democratic Process"?!?!?! | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 2:22 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not | Jeanine | Oct 26, 2006, 2:19 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not, Bruce? | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 2:13 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not, Bruce? | Bulldogg | Oct 26, 2006, 1:57 pm |
| Liberal Left | Tired of Anti Americans | Oct 26, 2006, 1:52 pm |
| RE: Why not, Bruce? | T.C. | Oct 26, 2006, 1:47 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:44 pm |
| RE: Eternal Damnation... | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:41 pm |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Silent Maj | Oct 26, 2006, 1:39 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not | Tolerant Christian | Oct 26, 2006, 1:38 pm |
| Eternal Damnation... | BLP | Oct 26, 2006, 1:24 pm |
| RE: Why not | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:15 pm |
| RE: RE: Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:10 pm |
| Why not "married"?!? | Confused | Oct 26, 2006, 1:04 pm |
| A step in the right direction! | KLS | Oct 26, 2006, 12:20 pm |
| RE: RE: Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | Mr. P. | Oct 26, 2006, 11:35 am |
| RE: Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | . | Oct 26, 2006, 9:02 am |
| Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | Mmmm... | Oct 26, 2006, 7:23 am |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Oct 26, 2006, 12:34 am |
|
| Same Sex Marriage | Unknown | Oct 25, 2006, 9:39 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: Uh, Bruce...I think there's a tilt here...
Jesus fulfilled the Old Testament Law and the Prophets for us vicariously in that He led a sinless life as God incarnate, and died as the sacrifice for the sins of His people. Faith in His atoning work applies the merits of His sacrifice to our souls.
The ceremonial laws (can't eat pork, mustn't mix wool and cotton) were temporary and passed away with the destruction of the temple and the succession of the Church in its place as a spiritual temple. So adultery is still wrong, but we can enjoy crab cakes.
As you can see there's more involved than you might expect. Try visiting a Bible-believing church and talking to the pastor, even if only out of intellectual curiosity - if not honestly wanting to understand the gospel.