East News
Viewing comments for:
N.J. High Court Rules Gays Entitled to Rights, Benefts of Marriage
East News October 25, 2006
The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that the equal protection clause of the state's constitution requires that "committed same-sex couples must be afforded on equal terms the same rights and ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| Equal Rights for Gays | Mmmmmmm | Oct 28, 2006, 11:12 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Still Going??? | caveat emptor | Oct 27, 2006, 5:51 pm |
| RE: RE: Still Going??? | caveat emptor | Oct 27, 2006, 5:50 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | Heather | Oct 27, 2006, 4:12 pm |
| Agree or Disagree | Mod Liberal | Oct 27, 2006, 4:07 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | KLS | Oct 27, 2006, 3:56 pm |
| RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | Saddened Citizen | Oct 27, 2006, 3:30 pm |
| RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | sam | Oct 27, 2006, 3:28 pm |
| RE: RE: Still Going??? | Mod Liberal | Oct 27, 2006, 2:52 pm |
| RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 2:22 pm |
| RE: Still Going??? | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 2:03 pm |
| Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | KLS | Oct 27, 2006, 1:47 pm |
| Still Going??? | Mod Liberal | Oct 27, 2006, 1:44 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bulldogg | Oct 27, 2006, 1:15 pm |
| RE: Uh, Bruce...I think there's a tilt here... | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 12:30 pm |
| Uh, Bruce...I think there's a tilt here... | Mmmmmmmmmm | Oct 27, 2006, 12:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: The Court Answered the ? before it... | Oct 27, 2006, 11:53 am |
|
| RE: RE: The Court Answered the ? before it... | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 11:35 am |
| RE: The Court Answered the ? before it... | . | Oct 27, 2006, 11:27 am |
| The Court Answered the ? before it... | Mmmmmmm... | Oct 27, 2006, 11:00 am |
| The point is... | Oct 27, 2006, 10:39 am |
|
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 7:57 am |
| Same Sex Marriage | Mmmmmm..... | Oct 27, 2006, 7:14 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Oct 26, 2006, 5:59 pm |
|
| RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Saddened Citizen | Oct 26, 2006, 5:43 pm |
| RE: RE: Eternal Damnation... | Oct 26, 2006, 5:23 pm |
|
| RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | bob laublaw | Oct 26, 2006, 5:21 pm |
| RE: "Democractic Process"?!?!?! | Misty Meanor | Oct 26, 2006, 5:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not, Bruce? | Oct 26, 2006, 5:13 pm |
|
| RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Oct 26, 2006, 4:58 pm |
|
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Offended | Oct 26, 2006, 4:54 pm |
| RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | . | Oct 26, 2006, 4:07 pm |
| As It Relates To Insurance | Joe Agent | Oct 26, 2006, 3:53 pm |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 3:12 pm |
| "Democratic Process"?!?!?! | Still Tired | Oct 26, 2006, 3:11 pm |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bulldogg | Oct 26, 2006, 3:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not | Bulldogg | Oct 26, 2006, 2:55 pm |
| Same Sex Marriage | Mod Liberal | Oct 26, 2006, 2:54 pm |
| RE: Democratic Process | Gregg Burns | Oct 26, 2006, 2:45 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 2:23 pm |
| "Democratic Process"?!?!?! | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 2:22 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not | Jeanine | Oct 26, 2006, 2:19 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not, Bruce? | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 2:13 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not, Bruce? | Bulldogg | Oct 26, 2006, 1:57 pm |
| Liberal Left | Tired of Anti Americans | Oct 26, 2006, 1:52 pm |
| RE: Why not, Bruce? | T.C. | Oct 26, 2006, 1:47 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:44 pm |
| RE: Eternal Damnation... | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:41 pm |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Silent Maj | Oct 26, 2006, 1:39 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not | Tolerant Christian | Oct 26, 2006, 1:38 pm |
| Eternal Damnation... | BLP | Oct 26, 2006, 1:24 pm |
| RE: Why not | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:15 pm |
| RE: RE: Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:10 pm |
| Why not "married"?!? | Confused | Oct 26, 2006, 1:04 pm |
| A step in the right direction! | KLS | Oct 26, 2006, 12:20 pm |
| RE: RE: Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | Mr. P. | Oct 26, 2006, 11:35 am |
| RE: Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | . | Oct 26, 2006, 9:02 am |
| Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | Mmmm... | Oct 26, 2006, 7:23 am |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Oct 26, 2006, 12:34 am |
|
| Same Sex Marriage | Unknown | Oct 25, 2006, 9:39 pm |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: Agree or Disagree
I must however, point out that the "sanctity" of marriage argument has been used to death, but where is the sanctity? People get married and divorced with weeks, and even days! The demise of the concept and the sanctity of marriage.
For me, I believe that this issue needs to be separated. The concept of marriage should occur in a church, or some other religion institution, while a civil union, which allows all the legal rights, should be filed though the state.
As far as adoption, where did these kids come from in the first place? Heterosexuals!
Gay parents do not make gay children, just like straight parents do not make only straight children, hence gays. People are who they are, NO ONE can make them straight or gay. I will tell you that gay people fostering a child or adopting a child is not a decision that they take very lightly. Would a child really be better as a ward of the state than with a loving person or couple?
Why are we being ridiculed for try to take responsibly for all other unwanted child and be part of the solution and not the problem?