East News
Viewing comments for:
N.J. High Court Rules Gays Entitled to Rights, Benefts of Marriage
East News • October 25, 2006
The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that the equal protection clause of the state's constitution requires that "committed same-sex couples must be afforded on equal terms the same rights and ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| Equal Rights for Gays | Mmmmmmm | Oct 28, 2006, 11:12 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Still Going??? | caveat emptor | Oct 27, 2006, 5:51 pm |
| RE: RE: Still Going??? | caveat emptor | Oct 27, 2006, 5:50 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | Heather | Oct 27, 2006, 4:12 pm |
| Agree or Disagree | Mod Liberal | Oct 27, 2006, 4:07 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | KLS | Oct 27, 2006, 3:56 pm |
| RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | Saddened Citizen | Oct 27, 2006, 3:30 pm |
| RE: RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | sam | Oct 27, 2006, 3:28 pm |
| RE: RE: Still Going??? | Mod Liberal | Oct 27, 2006, 2:52 pm |
| RE: Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 2:22 pm |
| RE: Still Going??? | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 2:03 pm |
| Agree or Disagree... Does it matter either way? | KLS | Oct 27, 2006, 1:47 pm |
| Still Going??? | Mod Liberal | Oct 27, 2006, 1:44 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bulldogg | Oct 27, 2006, 1:15 pm |
| RE: Uh, Bruce...I think there's a tilt here... | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 12:30 pm |
| Uh, Bruce...I think there's a tilt here... | Mmmmmmmmmm | Oct 27, 2006, 12:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: The Court Answered the ? before it... | Oct 27, 2006, 11:53 am |
|
| RE: RE: The Court Answered the ? before it... | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 11:35 am |
| RE: The Court Answered the ? before it... | . | Oct 27, 2006, 11:27 am |
| The Court Answered the ? before it... | Mmmmmmm... | Oct 27, 2006, 11:00 am |
| The point is... | Oct 27, 2006, 10:39 am |
|
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bruce | Oct 27, 2006, 7:57 am |
| Same Sex Marriage | Mmmmmm..... | Oct 27, 2006, 7:14 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Oct 26, 2006, 5:59 pm |
|
| RE: RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Saddened Citizen | Oct 26, 2006, 5:43 pm |
| RE: RE: Eternal Damnation... | Oct 26, 2006, 5:23 pm |
|
| RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | bob laublaw | Oct 26, 2006, 5:21 pm |
| RE: "Democractic Process"?!?!?! | Misty Meanor | Oct 26, 2006, 5:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not, Bruce? | Oct 26, 2006, 5:13 pm |
|
| RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | Oct 26, 2006, 4:58 pm |
|
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Offended | Oct 26, 2006, 4:54 pm |
| RE: RE: Same Sex Marriage | . | Oct 26, 2006, 4:07 pm |
| As It Relates To Insurance | Joe Agent | Oct 26, 2006, 3:53 pm |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 3:12 pm |
| "Democratic Process"?!?!?! | Still Tired | Oct 26, 2006, 3:11 pm |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Bulldogg | Oct 26, 2006, 3:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not | Bulldogg | Oct 26, 2006, 2:55 pm |
| Same Sex Marriage | Mod Liberal | Oct 26, 2006, 2:54 pm |
| RE: Democratic Process | Gregg Burns | Oct 26, 2006, 2:45 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 2:23 pm |
| "Democratic Process"?!?!?! | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 2:22 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not | Jeanine | Oct 26, 2006, 2:19 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not, Bruce? | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 2:13 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not, Bruce? | Bulldogg | Oct 26, 2006, 1:57 pm |
| Liberal Left | Tired of Anti Americans | Oct 26, 2006, 1:52 pm |
| RE: Why not, Bruce? | T.C. | Oct 26, 2006, 1:47 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why not | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:44 pm |
| RE: Eternal Damnation... | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:41 pm |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Silent Maj | Oct 26, 2006, 1:39 pm |
| RE: RE: Why not | Tolerant Christian | Oct 26, 2006, 1:38 pm |
| Eternal Damnation... | BLP | Oct 26, 2006, 1:24 pm |
| RE: Why not | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:15 pm |
| RE: RE: Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | Bruce | Oct 26, 2006, 1:10 pm |
| Why not "married"?!? | Confused | Oct 26, 2006, 1:04 pm |
| A step in the right direction! | KLS | Oct 26, 2006, 12:20 pm |
| RE: RE: Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | Mr. P. | Oct 26, 2006, 11:35 am |
| RE: Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | . | Oct 26, 2006, 9:02 am |
| Gays Entitled to benefits of Marriage | Mmmm... | Oct 26, 2006, 7:23 am |
| RE: Same Sex Marriage | Oct 26, 2006, 12:34 am |
|
| Same Sex Marriage | Unknown | Oct 25, 2006, 9:39 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: RE: Still Going???
Since you asked, the proof that the bible was written by men (which is what tolerant christian states - you have somehow turned that into asking where is the proof that it was not divinely INSPIRED which is impossible to either prove nor disprove) is right on the bible itself. The bible as presented to christians today is the "king james version". This is King James' VERSION of what might or might not be a divine document from ages ago. Now I didn't know the king personally but my guess is he had reason to not care much for many groups of people (women and intellectuals come to mind) and thus to skew his version of the bible to fit his ideas. Of course, I'm a destined-for-hell-which-I-don't-believe-in-buddhist so I likely won't be listened to but any objective (I.E. not taught by a religious institution/instructor) class on the history of the bible will be happy to confirm my words.
In any case bruce, I wish you a peaceful, loving, tolerant place in your heart and an open, thoughtful, discerning place in your mind that you might learn to love the world you live in and the humanity with which you share it.