Home > Talkback
East News

Viewing comments for:

No Horsing Around, Conn. High Court Tosses Liability Waiver

East News • October 26, 2006
A release from liability that a horseback riding farm requires all of its customers to sign violates public policy and is not enforceable, the Connecticut Supreme Court recently ruled. The high ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: RE: Slippery slope - pun intended

Posted On: October 26, 2006, 2:36 pm CDT
Posted By: LJK & Sam are right
Comment:
LJK & Sam are actually correct in their comments: "societal expectation" is what is controlling here. Who signed the waiver? The parent or the minor? What about assumption of risk? I guess they could have "trained" her on the plastic horse with the wheels over in the corner, but she probably would have been insulted & sued them for that!
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: TOM Jimmie
Nov 21, 2006, 9:28 pm
RE: RE: Fred, we read it, and you still missed the broader p
Nov 2, 2006, 8:17 pm
RE: Fred, we read it, and you still missed the broader point CT Skier
Oct 31, 2006, 11:40 am
Fred, we read it, and you still missed the broader point LJKSkiDude
Oct 31, 2006, 11:16 am
Did you guys read the article? Fred
Oct 30, 2006, 11:54 am
Liability Waiver LG
Oct 29, 2006, 2:51 pm
Perfect world Wild Bill
Oct 27, 2006, 12:08 pm
RE: RE: Bad Horse Bradley's tactic
Oct 26, 2006, 4:19 pm
RE: Bad Horse LJKSkiDude
Oct 26, 2006, 4:02 pm
Bad Horse Bradley
Oct 26, 2006, 3:14 pm
RE: Slippery slope - pun intended Riding Instructor
Oct 26, 2006, 2:54 pm
RE: Slippery slope - pun intended AG
Oct 26, 2006, 2:50 pm
RE: RE: RE: Slippery slope - pun intended LJK & Sam are right
Oct 26, 2006, 2:36 pm
RE: RE: Slippery slope - pun intended Tom
Oct 26, 2006, 2:23 pm
RE: Slippery slope - pun intended sam
Oct 26, 2006, 1:45 pm
Slippery slope - pun intended LJKSkiDude
Oct 26, 2006, 1:03 pm
skiing Mark
Oct 26, 2006, 12:54 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.