East News
Viewing comments for:
No Horsing Around, Conn. High Court Tosses Liability Waiver
East News • October 26, 2006
A release from liability that a horseback riding farm requires all of its customers to sign violates public policy and is not enforceable, the Connecticut Supreme Court recently ruled.
The high ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: TOM | Jimmie | Nov 21, 2006, 9:28 pm |
| RE: RE: Fred, we read it, and you still missed the broader p | Nov 2, 2006, 8:17 pm |
|
| RE: Fred, we read it, and you still missed the broader point | CT Skier | Oct 31, 2006, 11:40 am |
| Fred, we read it, and you still missed the broader point | LJKSkiDude | Oct 31, 2006, 11:16 am |
| Did you guys read the article? | Fred | Oct 30, 2006, 11:54 am |
| Liability Waiver | LG | Oct 29, 2006, 2:51 pm |
| Perfect world | Wild Bill | Oct 27, 2006, 12:08 pm |
| RE: RE: Bad Horse | Bradley's tactic | Oct 26, 2006, 4:19 pm |
| RE: Bad Horse | LJKSkiDude | Oct 26, 2006, 4:02 pm |
| Bad Horse | Bradley | Oct 26, 2006, 3:14 pm |
| RE: Slippery slope - pun intended | Riding Instructor | Oct 26, 2006, 2:54 pm |
| RE: Slippery slope - pun intended | AG | Oct 26, 2006, 2:50 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Slippery slope - pun intended | LJK & Sam are right | Oct 26, 2006, 2:36 pm |
| RE: RE: Slippery slope - pun intended | Tom | Oct 26, 2006, 2:23 pm |
| RE: Slippery slope - pun intended | sam | Oct 26, 2006, 1:45 pm |
| Slippery slope - pun intended | LJKSkiDude | Oct 26, 2006, 1:03 pm |
| skiing | Mark | Oct 26, 2006, 12:54 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: Did you guys read the article?
Think about what the waiver was saying. "If you use our services, we are not responsible for your safety in any way." Upholding that type of waiver/release creates a morale hazard for the defendant.