East News
Viewing comments for:
Lawmaker Seeks to Ban Pit Bulls from N.Y. City
East News December 29, 2006
Regarded as dangerous pets by their detractors but loved for their assertive nature by their owners, pit bulls may find themselves banned from New York City.
City Councilman Peter Vallone Junior ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: re: Dog Bties , muzzles, and why don't you read more ? | md | Jan 19, 2007, 3:02 pm |
| READ this ARTICLE ! PLEASE !!! | J. Lii | Jan 18, 2007, 11:41 pm |
| re: Dog Bties , muzzles, and why don't you read more ? | J. Lii | Jan 18, 2007, 11:33 pm |
| RE: Dog bites, etc. | md | Jan 13, 2007, 4:51 pm |
| RE: RE: Amazing the ignorance | md | Jan 13, 2007, 4:46 pm |
| just lack of exposure | Ashley | Jan 10, 2007, 10:06 pm |
| Please Email Vallone to Stop Pit Bull Ban Campaign | Jorin Hawley | Jan 10, 2007, 11:09 am |
| RE: RE: Ban the people AND the vicious weapons they call Do | One of the Few | Jan 3, 2007, 11:23 am |
| Next it will be Rottiweilers | Debbie | Jan 3, 2007, 9:43 am |
| one shot deal | bubba | Jan 2, 2007, 12:10 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Ban the people | Ray | Dec 31, 2006, 7:26 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Ban the people | Garth Courtney | Dec 30, 2006, 3:37 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Ban the people AND the vicious weapons they | caveat emptor | Dec 29, 2006, 6:14 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Ban the people AND the vicious weapons they cal | Give him a break | Dec 29, 2006, 5:20 pm |
| RE: RE: Ban the people AND the vicious weapons they call Do | caveat emptor | Dec 29, 2006, 4:50 pm |
| RE: Ban the people AND the vicious weapons they call Dogs | caveat emptor | Dec 29, 2006, 4:36 pm |
| RE: why? | caveat emptor | Dec 29, 2006, 4:33 pm |
| RE: Ban the people AND the vicious weapons they call Dogs | Pack Mentality | Dec 29, 2006, 3:14 pm |
| Ban the people AND the vicious weapons they call Dogs | Caveat Idiot | Dec 29, 2006, 3:10 pm |
| why? | bob | Dec 29, 2006, 2:43 pm |
| Dog bites, etc. | Ray | Dec 29, 2006, 2:27 pm |
| RE: Amazing the ignorance | Agreed | Dec 29, 2006, 2:06 pm |
| Amazing the ignorance | Sam | Dec 29, 2006, 1:54 pm |
| RE: RE: Ban the people | KLS | Dec 29, 2006, 1:24 pm |
| RE: Ban the people | caveat emptor | Dec 29, 2006, 10:20 am |
| Ban the people | DH | Dec 29, 2006, 8:58 am |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: RE: re: Dog Bties , muzzles, and why don't you read more ?
I really don't think it would be that difficult for the cops to see people with their dogs unmuzzled since people walk their dogs all over NYC. There are a few areas where I have seen people with their dogs off-leash, but we have LEASH laws for a reason! Imagine how many people would just let their dogs run around off-leash if we didn't have a leash law! So when it comes to muzzling, it may not be perfect & there are always people who break the laws, but it would be SOMETHING. You don't have to do much searching to see dogs being walked around NYC & it'd be pretty obvious if one of them wasn't wearing a muzzle. So it's not really a matter of search and destroy for the most part.
When it comes to registering & spaying/neutering & microchipping, I agree. My dog underwent all of those things. But it's a bit more difficult for a cop to SEE that a dog is microchipped, spayed/neutered, & registered than it is for them to SEE that it doesn't have a muzzle on. I know that when cops SEE it, they like to cause problems because I've experienced it myself. I actually WASN'T breaking the law even thought the cop THOUGHT I was (he had no idea there were service dogs besides just seeing eye dogs & tried to throw me & my service dog out of the subway until I set him straight & threatened him with a lawsuit), but it goes to show that if they are told that a certain thing is against the rules, they can and will throw their power around. They like to do that sort of thing.
The point is, why are you so resistant to muzzling? You say it's stupid because we have to get the city to actually enforce it & while I agree that they should, saying that a law is hard to enforce (i.e. cops usually don't want to bother) does not mean that the law should not exist. Why is it then not an acceptable step before banning pitbulls altogether? If you're that opposed to banning, why should you be so offended by a muzzle law? I'm a dog owner, a SERVICE dog owner, & I'm not opposed to my dog wearing a muzzle if that was the law.