East News
Viewing comments for:
Malpractice Suit by Former Pats' Coach Ends in Mistrial
East News February 22, 2007
A judge declared a mistrial Tuesday in Notre Dame coach Charlie Weis' medical malpractice lawsuit after a juror collapsed and several doctors — including the two defendants — rushed to his ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| We all need a hug; I can help Steve O. and Not Really... | Barak Obama | Feb 28, 2007, 2:24 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Charlie...and | Not Really | Feb 28, 2007, 2:20 pm |
| but it's an interesting theory on that moaning juror | chad balaamaba | Feb 28, 2007, 9:44 am |
| Dog Food Story | Sick & Tired | Feb 28, 2007, 9:31 am |
| we know why the juror was moaning... | Hebe Hebenez | Feb 28, 2007, 9:17 am |
| yeah, everyone goes to trial, revdjg | Frank Opinion | Feb 28, 2007, 9:08 am |
| Is Jeff the only reasonable one out there? | revdjg | Feb 27, 2007, 5:32 pm |
| maybe Charlie needs to try dog food diet again | Ramondo Balaamababa | Feb 27, 2007, 9:09 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Charlie...and Jeff, to | Not Really | Feb 27, 2007, 9:05 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Charlie...and Jeff, too. | Steve O. | Feb 26, 2007, 6:08 pm |
| Sorry Charlie...and Jeff, too. | Chad Balaamaba | Feb 26, 2007, 4:15 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Charlie...and Jeff, too. | Not really | Feb 26, 2007, 2:53 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Charlie...and Jeff, too. | Steve O. | Feb 26, 2007, 2:41 pm |
| RE: Medical Malpractce | Not really | Feb 26, 2007, 1:45 pm |
| Medical Malpractce | No MD here | Feb 26, 2007, 1:36 pm |
| Medical Malpractce | No MD here | Feb 26, 2007, 1:28 pm |
| RE: Sorry Charlie...and Jeff, too. | Vernal E. Quinox | Feb 23, 2007, 3:29 pm |
| sorry Charlie | Frank O Pinion | Feb 23, 2007, 3:24 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Charlie...and Jeff, too. | Jeff | Feb 23, 2007, 3:00 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Sorry Charlie...and Jeff, too. | Ross Perot | Feb 23, 2007, 2:45 pm |
| I agree with Mr. Change of the Season and Chad. .... | Ralph Balamabama | Feb 23, 2007, 2:39 pm |
| RE: RE: Sorry Charlie...and Jeff, too. | Jeff | Feb 23, 2007, 2:30 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Charlie | Vernal E Quinox | Feb 23, 2007, 2:17 pm |
| RE: Sorry Charlie...and Jeff, too. | Chad Balaamaba | Feb 23, 2007, 2:07 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Sorry Charlie | Jeff | Feb 23, 2007, 1:38 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Charlie | Jeff | Feb 23, 2007, 1:24 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Sorry Charlie | Steve O. | Feb 23, 2007, 12:51 pm |
| RE: RE: Sorry Charlie | Vernal E Quinox | Feb 23, 2007, 12:03 pm |
| RE: Sorry Charlie | Jeff | Feb 23, 2007, 10:30 am |
| What that juror probably needed... | Wake up call... | Feb 23, 2007, 8:48 am |
| Sorry Charlie | Vernal E Quinox | Feb 22, 2007, 10:56 pm |
| RE: moaning | Big Mike In CALI | Feb 22, 2007, 3:02 pm |
| RE: moaning | Jeff | Feb 22, 2007, 2:59 pm |
| moaning | ad | Feb 22, 2007, 12:57 pm |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: RE: Sorry Charlie...and Jeff, too.
looks like you're a bit confused, but that's ok, you sound like a bleeding heart, which means you think with your feelings. Nice of you to offer to use smaller words for us; looks like you probably have problems with the bigger ones.
It looked pretty clear like you were lining up behind the plaintiff, but heck, I just read it; I don't know how you 'feel'. Sleep easy, though, the plaintiff didn't lose a leg, arm, or other appendage; it doesn't look like drinking was involved.
You remind me of the kooks who argue with someone who is pro-life with comments like "well, what if your daughter is impregnated by a space alien, you'd want her to have that baby?!?"
Jeff, calm down; it appears no one is trying to take anyone's right to sue away in this column. Some of us question why there is a large contingency who pretend that anytime something goes wrong, 'someone has to pay'. Sounds like you are one of those people, Jeff. It's ok to take responsibility for one's self; I know, that's a big word, but I think you can handle it.
See, Chuck could be telling the world of the real dangers of this surgery, while he talks about how blessed he feels that he survived, how things have turned out so well for him. But instead, we get to read about his little lawsuit here, in the IJ, not exactly People magazine, but maybe he doesn't want it too publicized.
You have to admit, if the case was really going well for Chuck, odds are he wouldn't have let his attorneys call for a mistrial.
Sometimes we try to 'read between the lines' when we don't have all the facts. Nope, I wasn't at the trial, didn't perform the surgery, don't know if Chuck took the proper precautions or even showed up as a drunk patient for his own surgery. No, the best we can do is try to guess what really happened.
Now about the lost arm and drunk doctor thing, that was a really stupid argument, Jeff. Sorry.