Posted On: July 2, 2007, 10:19 pm CDT

Posted By: wudchuck

well, how is it lowball, when in good faith they were solvent for $1 mil...that to me is not bad faith...what is a shame is why did the bar not have a higher limit of liability? $1 mil is not enough...i think it's the owner of the bar that might be the problem...because, u see where the insurance did pay the $1 mil...bad faith? NO -- Bad judgement of the bartender who kept serving -- YES. Bad Judgement on the DRIVER -- YES! why do we always try to push the issue that it is always someone else's fault and not our own... the bartender did not force the drinker the drink...did not force him to drive his car...why is society so entrenched in getting after the other person/company - instead of taking the blame...is that because the person does not have money? then why are we not suing for the company whom sold the person the bullet or sold the rifle to the person whom murdered someone? we don't -- again, it's a matter of principal -- taking responsiblity for the actions you do!!!