East News
Viewing comments for:
Insurer Reported to Pay $20 Million to Settle Bad Faith Claim in Pa.
East News • July 2, 2007
An insurer has agreed to pay $20 million in what is believed to be the state's richest settlement of a bad faith claim.
According to the plaintiff's attorney, Robert Mongeluzzi of Saltz Mongeluzzi ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: bad faith | We finally got a little relief | Jul 11, 2007, 2:10 pm |
| RE: Get the facts before you comment | wudchuck | Jul 10, 2007, 2:02 pm |
| Get the facts before you comment | Jul 10, 2007, 12:05 pm |
|
| RE: RE: bad faith | David Williams | Jul 9, 2007, 11:18 pm |
| RE: bad faith | wudchuck | Jul 9, 2007, 11:14 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: bad faith | farful mctavish | Jul 9, 2007, 9:49 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: bad faith | David Williams | Jul 9, 2007, 9:39 pm |
| RE: RE: bad faith | farful mctavish | Jul 9, 2007, 9:30 pm |
| RE: RE: bad faith | tim | Jul 9, 2007, 9:24 pm |
| RE: bad faith | wudchuck | Jul 9, 2007, 8:26 pm |
| RE: RE: bad faith | adjuster | Jul 9, 2007, 7:56 pm |
| RE: bad faith | wudchuck | Jul 9, 2007, 7:06 pm |
| bad faith | clm mgr | Jul 9, 2007, 12:36 pm |
| RE: Could it be??? | No Longer "Big Insurance" | Jul 9, 2007, 12:35 pm |
| Could it be??? | Stowers? | Jul 9, 2007, 11:40 am |
| Host Liquor or Liquor Liab Form | ad | Jul 9, 2007, 11:34 am |
| RE: Some off you are confused | wudchuck | Jul 6, 2007, 6:55 am |
| RE: Some off you are confused - Righ On | of all people | Jul 5, 2007, 6:24 pm |
| Some off you are confused. | Jeff | Jul 5, 2007, 3:25 pm |
| reading?! | wudchuck | Jul 4, 2007, 7:12 am |
| RE: RE: Am I reading this right? | tim | Jul 4, 2007, 6:12 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: LOWBALL? | Farful McTavish | Jul 3, 2007, 6:24 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: LOWBALL? | wudchuck | Jul 3, 2007, 4:48 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: homework / Happy 4 | Mike | Jul 3, 2007, 4:07 pm |
| RE: RE: homework / Happy 4 | Rubeus Hagrid | Jul 3, 2007, 2:15 pm |
| RE: homework / Happy 4 | Huh? | Jul 3, 2007, 1:23 pm |
| homework / Happy 4 | Jul 3, 2007, 12:00 pm |
|
| RE: LOWBALL? | Jul 3, 2007, 11:45 am |
|
| RE: RE: LOWBALL? | steven | Jul 3, 2007, 8:37 am |
| RE: LOWBALL? | Farful McTavish | Jul 2, 2007, 10:31 pm |
| LOWBALL? | wudchuck | Jul 2, 2007, 10:19 pm |
| RE: RE: bad | ; | Jul 2, 2007, 6:57 pm |
| RE: RE: bad faith | FAITH IN THAT. | Jul 2, 2007, 6:55 pm |
| RE: RE: Am I reading this right? | steven | Jul 2, 2007, 3:11 pm |
| RE: bad faith | Of All People | Jul 2, 2007, 3:10 pm |
| RE: Am I reading this right? | NYUND | Jul 2, 2007, 2:58 pm |
| RE: Am I reading this right? | Ken | Jul 2, 2007, 2:57 pm |
| Am I reading this right? | Confused | Jul 2, 2007, 2:34 pm |
| bad faith | Farful McTavish | Jul 2, 2007, 2:04 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: LOWBALL?
They lowballed and got stung. Maybe next time, after this 20 million dollar education, they will do right by their insured.