Home > Talkback
East News

Viewing comments for:

Insurer Reported to Pay $20 Million to Settle Bad Faith Claim in Pa.

East News • July 2, 2007
An insurer has agreed to pay $20 million in what is believed to be the state's richest settlement of a bad faith claim. According to the plaintiff's attorney, Robert Mongeluzzi of Saltz Mongeluzzi ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: Am I reading this right?

Posted On: July 4, 2007, 6:12 am CDT
Posted By: tim
Comment:
Wow!! Though I am sorry for the injured party, this award is excessive. Remember this injury was caused by a drunken driver who choose to drink and drive. This is considered a criminal offense. I believe the responsible party is the driver "not the tavern". Although the travern did have liablity insurance in place, I don't believe the insurance company should take responsibility in excess of the policy limits. Crafty attorneys who will receive a large percentage of the award settlement will ultimately benefit from this judgement. In addition, now the business owner such as myself will be faced with higher insurance premiums. "The Insurance Doctor"
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: bad faith We finally got a little relief
Jul 11, 2007, 2:10 pm
RE: Get the facts before you comment wudchuck
Jul 10, 2007, 2:02 pm
Get the facts before you comment
Jul 10, 2007, 12:05 pm
RE: RE: bad faith David Williams
Jul 9, 2007, 11:18 pm
RE: bad faith wudchuck
Jul 9, 2007, 11:14 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: bad faith farful mctavish
Jul 9, 2007, 9:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: bad faith David Williams
Jul 9, 2007, 9:39 pm
RE: RE: bad faith farful mctavish
Jul 9, 2007, 9:30 pm
RE: RE: bad faith tim
Jul 9, 2007, 9:24 pm
RE: bad faith wudchuck
Jul 9, 2007, 8:26 pm
RE: RE: bad faith adjuster
Jul 9, 2007, 7:56 pm
RE: bad faith wudchuck
Jul 9, 2007, 7:06 pm
bad faith clm mgr
Jul 9, 2007, 12:36 pm
RE: Could it be??? No Longer "Big Insurance"
Jul 9, 2007, 12:35 pm
Could it be??? Stowers?
Jul 9, 2007, 11:40 am
Host Liquor or Liquor Liab Form ad
Jul 9, 2007, 11:34 am
RE: Some off you are confused wudchuck
Jul 6, 2007, 6:55 am
RE: Some off you are confused - Righ On of all people
Jul 5, 2007, 6:24 pm
Some off you are confused. Jeff
Jul 5, 2007, 3:25 pm
reading?! wudchuck
Jul 4, 2007, 7:12 am
RE: RE: Am I reading this right? tim
Jul 4, 2007, 6:12 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: LOWBALL? Farful McTavish
Jul 3, 2007, 6:24 pm
RE: RE: RE: LOWBALL? wudchuck
Jul 3, 2007, 4:48 pm
RE: RE: RE: homework / Happy 4 Mike
Jul 3, 2007, 4:07 pm
RE: RE: homework / Happy 4 Rubeus Hagrid
Jul 3, 2007, 2:15 pm
RE: homework / Happy 4 Huh?
Jul 3, 2007, 1:23 pm
homework / Happy 4
Jul 3, 2007, 12:00 pm
RE: LOWBALL?
Jul 3, 2007, 11:45 am
RE: RE: LOWBALL? steven
Jul 3, 2007, 8:37 am
RE: LOWBALL? Farful McTavish
Jul 2, 2007, 10:31 pm
LOWBALL? wudchuck
Jul 2, 2007, 10:19 pm
RE: RE: bad ;
Jul 2, 2007, 6:57 pm
RE: RE: bad faith FAITH IN THAT.
Jul 2, 2007, 6:55 pm
RE: RE: Am I reading this right? steven
Jul 2, 2007, 3:11 pm
RE: bad faith Of All People
Jul 2, 2007, 3:10 pm
RE: Am I reading this right? NYUND
Jul 2, 2007, 2:58 pm
RE: Am I reading this right? Ken
Jul 2, 2007, 2:57 pm
Am I reading this right? Confused
Jul 2, 2007, 2:34 pm
bad faith Farful McTavish
Jul 2, 2007, 2:04 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.