Home > Talkback
East News

Viewing comments for:

Insurer Reported to Pay $20 Million to Settle Bad Faith Claim in Pa.

East News • July 2, 2007
An insurer has agreed to pay $20 million in what is believed to be the state's richest settlement of a bad faith claim. According to the plaintiff's attorney, Robert Mongeluzzi of Saltz Mongeluzzi ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: bad faith

Posted On: July 9, 2007, 9:24 pm CDT
Posted By: tim
Comment:
Now, wait, I believe coverage should be denied, since the insured is the plaintif in this case.(unbelieable) Shouldn't coverage be excluded since we can't sue ourselves? Hummmm, does Princeton make it a practice to deny ligtimate claims? I believe a jury should look at claims paying history before punitive damages are awarded. I wish I was the defense attorney in this case. I understand why Princeton withheld payment or didn't offer a settlement. apeal, apeal, apeal
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: bad faith We finally got a little relief
Jul 11, 2007, 2:10 pm
RE: Get the facts before you comment wudchuck
Jul 10, 2007, 2:02 pm
Get the facts before you comment
Jul 10, 2007, 12:05 pm
RE: RE: bad faith David Williams
Jul 9, 2007, 11:18 pm
RE: bad faith wudchuck
Jul 9, 2007, 11:14 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: bad faith farful mctavish
Jul 9, 2007, 9:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: bad faith David Williams
Jul 9, 2007, 9:39 pm
RE: RE: bad faith farful mctavish
Jul 9, 2007, 9:30 pm
RE: RE: bad faith tim
Jul 9, 2007, 9:24 pm
RE: bad faith wudchuck
Jul 9, 2007, 8:26 pm
RE: RE: bad faith adjuster
Jul 9, 2007, 7:56 pm
RE: bad faith wudchuck
Jul 9, 2007, 7:06 pm
bad faith clm mgr
Jul 9, 2007, 12:36 pm
RE: Could it be??? No Longer "Big Insurance"
Jul 9, 2007, 12:35 pm
Could it be??? Stowers?
Jul 9, 2007, 11:40 am
Host Liquor or Liquor Liab Form ad
Jul 9, 2007, 11:34 am
RE: Some off you are confused wudchuck
Jul 6, 2007, 6:55 am
RE: Some off you are confused - Righ On of all people
Jul 5, 2007, 6:24 pm
Some off you are confused. Jeff
Jul 5, 2007, 3:25 pm
reading?! wudchuck
Jul 4, 2007, 7:12 am
RE: RE: Am I reading this right? tim
Jul 4, 2007, 6:12 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: LOWBALL? Farful McTavish
Jul 3, 2007, 6:24 pm
RE: RE: RE: LOWBALL? wudchuck
Jul 3, 2007, 4:48 pm
RE: RE: RE: homework / Happy 4 Mike
Jul 3, 2007, 4:07 pm
RE: RE: homework / Happy 4 Rubeus Hagrid
Jul 3, 2007, 2:15 pm
RE: homework / Happy 4 Huh?
Jul 3, 2007, 1:23 pm
homework / Happy 4
Jul 3, 2007, 12:00 pm
RE: LOWBALL?
Jul 3, 2007, 11:45 am
RE: RE: LOWBALL? steven
Jul 3, 2007, 8:37 am
RE: LOWBALL? Farful McTavish
Jul 2, 2007, 10:31 pm
LOWBALL? wudchuck
Jul 2, 2007, 10:19 pm
RE: RE: bad ;
Jul 2, 2007, 6:57 pm
RE: RE: bad faith FAITH IN THAT.
Jul 2, 2007, 6:55 pm
RE: RE: Am I reading this right? steven
Jul 2, 2007, 3:11 pm
RE: bad faith Of All People
Jul 2, 2007, 3:10 pm
RE: Am I reading this right? NYUND
Jul 2, 2007, 2:58 pm
RE: Am I reading this right? Ken
Jul 2, 2007, 2:57 pm
Am I reading this right? Confused
Jul 2, 2007, 2:34 pm
bad faith Farful McTavish
Jul 2, 2007, 2:04 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.