East News

Viewing comments for:

Insurer Reported to Pay $20 Million to Settle Bad Faith Claim in Pa.

East News • July 2, 2007
An insurer has agreed to pay $20 million in what is believed to be the state's richest settlement of a bad faith claim. According to the plaintiff's attorney, Robert Mongeluzzi of Saltz Mongeluzzi ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: RE: bad faith

Posted On: July 11, 2007, 2:10 pm CDT
Posted By: We finally got a little relief
Comment:
We finally got a little relief," Denton said. "We're pleased that we were able to get our current State Farm cases resolved. What it indicates to me is that we have finally reached some middle ground with State Farm that has created a basis on which we can settle our State Farm cases."

More than 200 lawsuits are pending against the insurer in U.S. District Court. Evidence unearthed so far indicates State Farm denied payments for wind damage in coastal areas also subjected to storm surge. State Farm relied on a clause in its policies that purports to say wind damage is not covered when water contributes.

Under pressure from state officials, and with an unfavorable court ruling early in the year, the insurer is now re-evaluating claims and offering wind-damage payments to policyholders whose property the storm swept away, leaving only slabs or pilings. The insurer also will review the claims of other Coast policyholders who request it.

State Farm, the state and nation's largest property insurer, has about 35,000 customers in the three Coast counties. The company has paid more than $1.2 billion for hurricane damage statewide.

Its claims re-evaluation process is being overseen by Insurance Commissioner George Dale, whose office, because of consumer complaints, is investigating how the insurer handled Katrina claims.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: bad faith We finally got a little relief
Jul 11, 2007, 2:10 pm
RE: Get the facts before you comment wudchuck
Jul 10, 2007, 2:02 pm
Get the facts before you comment
Jul 10, 2007, 12:05 pm
RE: RE: bad faith David Williams
Jul 9, 2007, 11:18 pm
RE: bad faith wudchuck
Jul 9, 2007, 11:14 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: bad faith farful mctavish
Jul 9, 2007, 9:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: bad faith David Williams
Jul 9, 2007, 9:39 pm
RE: RE: bad faith farful mctavish
Jul 9, 2007, 9:30 pm
RE: RE: bad faith tim
Jul 9, 2007, 9:24 pm
RE: bad faith wudchuck
Jul 9, 2007, 8:26 pm
RE: RE: bad faith adjuster
Jul 9, 2007, 7:56 pm
RE: bad faith wudchuck
Jul 9, 2007, 7:06 pm
bad faith clm mgr
Jul 9, 2007, 12:36 pm
RE: Could it be??? No Longer "Big Insurance"
Jul 9, 2007, 12:35 pm
Could it be??? Stowers?
Jul 9, 2007, 11:40 am
Host Liquor or Liquor Liab Form ad
Jul 9, 2007, 11:34 am
RE: Some off you are confused wudchuck
Jul 6, 2007, 6:55 am
RE: Some off you are confused - Righ On of all people
Jul 5, 2007, 6:24 pm
Some off you are confused. Jeff
Jul 5, 2007, 3:25 pm
reading?! wudchuck
Jul 4, 2007, 7:12 am
RE: RE: Am I reading this right? tim
Jul 4, 2007, 6:12 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: LOWBALL? Farful McTavish
Jul 3, 2007, 6:24 pm
RE: RE: RE: LOWBALL? wudchuck
Jul 3, 2007, 4:48 pm
RE: RE: RE: homework / Happy 4 Mike
Jul 3, 2007, 4:07 pm
RE: RE: homework / Happy 4 Rubeus Hagrid
Jul 3, 2007, 2:15 pm
RE: homework / Happy 4 Huh?
Jul 3, 2007, 1:23 pm
homework / Happy 4
Jul 3, 2007, 12:00 pm
RE: LOWBALL?
Jul 3, 2007, 11:45 am
RE: RE: LOWBALL? steven
Jul 3, 2007, 8:37 am
RE: LOWBALL? Farful McTavish
Jul 2, 2007, 10:31 pm
LOWBALL? wudchuck
Jul 2, 2007, 10:19 pm
RE: RE: bad ;
Jul 2, 2007, 6:57 pm
RE: RE: bad faith FAITH IN THAT.
Jul 2, 2007, 6:55 pm
RE: RE: Am I reading this right? steven
Jul 2, 2007, 3:11 pm
RE: bad faith Of All People
Jul 2, 2007, 3:10 pm
RE: Am I reading this right? NYUND
Jul 2, 2007, 2:58 pm
RE: Am I reading this right? Ken
Jul 2, 2007, 2:57 pm
Am I reading this right? Confused
Jul 2, 2007, 2:34 pm
bad faith Farful McTavish
Jul 2, 2007, 2:04 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.