East News

Viewing comments for:

N.Y. Proposes 'Rainy Day' Catastrophe Insurance Fund With Eventual Tax Break

East News • October 5, 2007
Insurance companies providing homeowners, business and other property insurance in New York State would be required to create a catastrophe reserve fund to help pay claims caused by hurricanes and ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: Superintendent Dinallo (and Spitzer Administration) miss

Posted On: October 6, 2007, 7:49 am CDT
Posted By: Temblor
Comment:
You would think the Superintendent of Insurance would better understand how the industry works.The industry funded the 9/11 losses with no problem. the industry funded the hurricanes of '04 and '05 with no problem.

If he wants to see homeowners premiums come down, why not require homeowners in hurricane target areas to protect their homes against same? Even in Florida, a large number of homes and businesses do not even have shutters, the best protection of all.

Hurricane losses are caused by poorly constructed buildings built in areas where they shouldn't be, and being poorly protected as well.

In '05 Hurricane Wilma, crossed S. Florida with top wind speeds perhaps approaching 110 mph, caused $21,500,000,000 in damage.

Why? Lousy construction, and lack of hurricane protection.

A recent survey of inhabitants of hurricane prone areas showed 88% have taken no steps to protect their homes.

But they still want low premiums.

Florida has attempted to set up a hurricane catastrophe fund to provide cheap reinsurance to insurers. After '04 and '05 it had to borrow $13,500,000,000 to pay it's claims, it's paying that back over 10 years.

It currently has $2,000,000,000 in the bank, but it's liabilities from it's reinsurance contracts total $27,500,000,000.

The state forces insurers to buy it's reinsurance, but companies are so wary of it's ability to pay, that they then buy reinsurance against the fund not being able to pay it's losses.

Our new governer, Charlie Crist doesn't care if he bankrupts the state government as long as he can look as if he's doing something to protect us from those evil insurance companies.
Subject Posted By Posted On
another point of view another actuary
Oct 30, 2007, 2:10 am
RE: RE: Rainy Day Fund an actuary
Oct 9, 2007, 7:15 am
RE: Rainy Day Fund lastbat
Oct 8, 2007, 11:27 am
Rainy Day Fund gary
Oct 7, 2007, 1:18 pm
RE: Superintendent Dinallo (and Spitzer Administration) miss Temblor
Oct 6, 2007, 7:49 am
Superintendent Dinallo (and Spitzer Administration) misses t CCD
Oct 5, 2007, 4:05 pm
RE: RE: Why stop with insurance companies? DC
Oct 5, 2007, 2:52 pm
RE: Why stop with insurance companies? P Funk
Oct 5, 2007, 1:18 pm
Questions? Sam
Oct 5, 2007, 12:49 pm
Why stop with insurance companies? DC
Oct 5, 2007, 11:16 am
Learn something new every day lastbat
Oct 5, 2007, 10:12 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.