East News
Viewing comments for:
N.Y. Proposes 'Rainy Day' Catastrophe Insurance Fund With Eventual Tax Break
East News October 5, 2007
Insurance companies providing homeowners, business and other property insurance in New York State would be required to create a catastrophe reserve fund to help pay claims caused by hurricanes and ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| another point of view | another actuary | Oct 30, 2007, 2:10 am |
| RE: RE: Rainy Day Fund | an actuary | Oct 9, 2007, 7:15 am |
| RE: Rainy Day Fund | lastbat | Oct 8, 2007, 11:27 am |
| Rainy Day Fund | gary | Oct 7, 2007, 1:18 pm |
| RE: Superintendent Dinallo (and Spitzer Administration) miss | Temblor | Oct 6, 2007, 7:49 am |
| Superintendent Dinallo (and Spitzer Administration) misses t | CCD | Oct 5, 2007, 4:05 pm |
| RE: RE: Why stop with insurance companies? | DC | Oct 5, 2007, 2:52 pm |
| RE: Why stop with insurance companies? | P Funk | Oct 5, 2007, 1:18 pm |
| Questions? | Sam | Oct 5, 2007, 12:49 pm |
| Why stop with insurance companies? | DC | Oct 5, 2007, 11:16 am |
| Learn something new every day | lastbat | Oct 5, 2007, 10:12 am |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: RE: RE: Rainy Day Fund
As written the regulations will make hurricane insurance more expensive and less available. The contributions to the funds require all cat-related premium net of taxes and reinsurance to be put into the fund for 20 years. From an insurance company perspective, why would they do this? They get to take all the risk and have to delay reward for 20 years. They can get better risk-adjusted returns elsewhere. On top of that, this cat reserve is subject to premium tax and annual income taxes for 20 years. It's a no-brainer. Smart companies will pass on coastal exposure.