East News
Viewing comments for:
Mass. Supreme Court Expands Doctors' Liability to Nonpatients
East News • December 11, 2007
A Massachusetts physician is responsible to all third parties who might possibly be affected by his failure to warn a patient about the side effects of a medication, the Massachusetts Supreme ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: Simple case of cost shifting | Eli | Dec 13, 2007, 7:59 am |
| RE: Simple case of cost shifting | Calif ExPat | Dec 12, 2007, 5:10 pm |
| Simple case of cost shifting | Bob | Dec 12, 2007, 4:08 pm |
| doctor-patient communication | Casual Observer | Dec 12, 2007, 3:54 pm |
| RE: RE: Drug Side Effects | wudchuck | Dec 12, 2007, 3:10 pm |
| RE: Drug Side Effects | Joe B | Dec 12, 2007, 2:59 pm |
| yee haw, a new car | Mr Obvious | Dec 12, 2007, 2:37 pm |
| RE: Mass. Supreme Court Expands Doctors' Liability to Nonpat | wudchuck | Dec 12, 2007, 7:43 am |
| Mass. Supreme Court Expands Doctors' Liability to Nonpatient | Jean Miller | Dec 12, 2007, 4:35 am |
| yet more frivolousness... | Mary B. | Dec 11, 2007, 2:52 pm |
| where will it end? | wudchuck | Dec 11, 2007, 2:52 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: doctor-patient communication
How does anyone know that the doctor didn't warn his patient?
Further, even if the doctor didn't warn him, what about the printout of info provided by his pharmacy when he filled the prescripton?
Massachusetts continues to be a state (commonwealth) that leads the nation in stupid decisions.