Posted On: March 7, 2008, 3:00 pm CST

Posted By: Al

John Kerry, both Clintons, Algore and others were adamant about Saddam having weapons banned by the cease fire agreement that ended Guf War I. So the fifteen violations of those terms for fourteen years despite fifteen UN resolutions left the civilized world with no options but to take action. The alternative to waiting for him to come clean was to await his use of WMD's. Could a responsible leader have made that choice?

Chemical weapons were found in Iraq by US troops, as were missiles banned by the GWI cease fire.

Congress passed a "sense of the congress" resolution in the 90's (I forget the exact year) stating that it was official US policy to seek regime change in Iraq.

The Chech and Brit intel agencies stand by their stories that Iraq was seeking enriched uranium in Africa and that Saddam's agents were meeting with Al Qaeda.

Abu mussad al Zarqawi, Abu Nidal, and other AQ and non-AQ terrorists were in Baghdad with Saddam's permission.

Iraq was on the "watchlist of terrorist sponsoring nations."

Saddam was paying $25k to suicide bombers who killed Jews.

For "mainstream" sources for these and similar items, go here:
http://www.nci.org/sadb.htm.

He who hesitates is lost.