East News
Viewing comments for:
New Jersey Jury Awards $19M to Woman in Malpractice Case
East News March 20, 2008
A jury in Monmouth County, New Jersey awarded more than $19 million to a Freehold woman whose 10-year-old son was born with severe brain damage and cerebral palsy.
A judge could reduce Monday's ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: at least jurors attempt to review the facts | Trialman | Mar 21, 2008, 2:34 pm |
| RE: Definitely worth an appeal | johnny | Mar 21, 2008, 2:24 pm |
| RE: | cletus | Mar 21, 2008, 10:50 am |
| "Malpractice" verdict | Calif Ex Pat | Mar 20, 2008, 5:16 pm |
| RE: Malpractice Suite | lastbat | Mar 20, 2008, 4:48 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: at least jurors attempt to review the facts firs | Ike | Mar 20, 2008, 3:11 pm |
| RE: RE: at least jurors attempt to review the facts first... | Nobody Important | Mar 20, 2008, 2:54 pm |
| RE: at least jurors attempt to review the facts first... | Ron | Mar 20, 2008, 2:32 pm |
| RE: at least jurors attempt to review the facts first... | Maybe | Mar 20, 2008, 2:18 pm |
| Malpractice Suite | Sybil | Mar 20, 2008, 2:16 pm |
| at least jurors attempt to review the facts first... | Rick | Mar 20, 2008, 1:51 pm |
| RE: Definitely worth an appeal | Dread | Mar 20, 2008, 1:25 pm |
| Definitely worth an appeal | lastbat | Mar 20, 2008, 9:14 am |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: RE: at least jurors attempt to review the facts first...
"Law. failure of a professional person, as a physician or lawyer, to render proper services through reprehensible ignorance or negligence or through criminal intent, esp. when injury or loss follows.
2. any improper, negligent practice; misconduct or misuse."
This is a rigid standard that is obviously not adhered to by juries.
Nowhere in that definition is the requirement a medical professional be clairvoyant or otherwise anticipate every conceivable bodily condition or malfunction that might impact the outcome of a surgery or procedure. I challenge anyone to name a profession that achieves 100% perfection. Lord knows it isn't plaintiff attorneys. The best we can expect of a medical professional is that he/she does the best he/she can relying on their expert judgment and education.
An un-satisfactory outcome doesn't automatically translate to malpractice.
Our legal system has punished doctors to the point many of the good ones are being forced to leave their practice because of malpractice premiums. The attorneys pay nothing into the system.....they add no value to it.........they only take from it. Why shouldn't they participate in the cost of funding their livelihood by helping fund malpractice premiums?