East News
Viewing comments for:
New Jersey Court: Injured Delivery Driver Can't Collect Damages
East News • April 9, 2008
A truck driver struck by a car while making an early-morning delivery stop at a New Jersey Taco Bell cannot collect damages from his employer because his injuries entitled him to workers' ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: Joseph Dadura' law suit | Denise | May 20, 2008, 7:36 am |
| Joseph Dadura' law suit | jffmaryann | May 20, 2008, 7:27 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Exclusive remedy | lastbat | Apr 10, 2008, 5:03 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Exclusive remedy | charlie | Apr 10, 2008, 4:54 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: I Do Not Understand | Anne | Apr 10, 2008, 4:42 pm |
| THINK OUTSIDE THE BUN | INSURANCE IDIOT | Apr 10, 2008, 12:36 pm |
| RE: RE: I Do Not Understand | Jack J Maniscalco | Apr 10, 2008, 8:46 am |
| RE: I Do Not Understand | spiritsoul777 | Apr 10, 2008, 8:36 am |
| I Do Not Understand | Jack J Maniscalco | Apr 10, 2008, 7:56 am |
| CAN'T COLLECT FROM HIS EMPLOYER | spiritsoul777 | Apr 9, 2008, 9:41 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Exclusive remedy | Hang on lastbat | Apr 9, 2008, 5:16 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Exclusive remedy | lastbat | Apr 9, 2008, 4:26 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: I Do Not Understand | Al | Apr 9, 2008, 3:42 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Exclusive remedy | Step back a bit | Apr 9, 2008, 3:41 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: I Do Not Understand | Dustin | Apr 9, 2008, 3:38 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: I Do Not Understand | Al | Apr 9, 2008, 3:24 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: I Do Not Understand | Suspicious | Apr 9, 2008, 3:12 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: I Do Not Understand | Nobody Important | Apr 9, 2008, 2:46 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: I Do Not Understand | Al | Apr 9, 2008, 2:40 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: I Do Not Understand | lastbat | Apr 9, 2008, 2:35 pm |
| RE: RE: Exclusive remedy | lastbat | Apr 9, 2008, 2:30 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: I Do Not Understand | Al | Apr 9, 2008, 2:29 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: I Do Not Understand | lastbat | Apr 9, 2008, 2:24 pm |
| RE: RE: I Do Not Understand | Hera | Apr 9, 2008, 1:47 pm |
| RE: I Do Not Understand | Al | Apr 9, 2008, 1:47 pm |
| RE: I Do Not Understand | Reagan | Apr 9, 2008, 1:41 pm |
| RE: Exclusive remedy | Matt | Apr 9, 2008, 1:34 pm |
| RE: Exclusive remedy | claims | Apr 9, 2008, 1:21 pm |
| RE: I Do Not Understand | lastbat | Apr 9, 2008, 12:56 pm |
| I Do Not Understand | Fatima | Apr 9, 2008, 12:38 pm |
| Exclusive remedy | lastbat | Apr 9, 2008, 10:17 am |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: I Do Not Understand
This patricular posting started as a discussion of WC and exclusive rememedy and degraded into childish whining.
People, let's keep to the point of the articile under discussion and leave the remaining points of view to other boards.
We have a right to free speech, but also an obligation to use it responsibly.
I have found others' opinions and points of view of value when confined to the insurance matter at hand. When the discussion devolves into typical internet snide comments and "gotchas", the value of the exchange is diminished.
I apologize for mouting my "soapbox", but at some point one of us has to ask for a return to the purpose of this particular messgae board.