East News
Viewing comments for:
Court Turns Maryland Condo Insurance Upside Down
East News June 3, 2008
A dispute over $6,400 in damage to a Maryland townhouse led to an unexpected court decision that has reversed 26 years of standard industry practice, and left insurers, agents, lawmakers and ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: MD Agents are totally wrong | Condo Writer | Jul 10, 2008, 8:23 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: MD Agents are totally wrong | Don | Jul 10, 2008, 7:53 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Bare Walls | Interested | Jun 19, 2008, 9:09 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Bare Walls | Scott | Jun 19, 2008, 9:06 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Bare Walls | Ins | Jun 19, 2008, 9:02 am |
| RE: RE: Bare Walls | Retired | Jun 19, 2008, 8:46 am |
| RE: Bare Walls | Ins | Jun 19, 2008, 7:46 am |
| RE: Condo Policy vs Master Policy | rrb | Jun 16, 2008, 12:56 pm |
| RE: Bare Walls In Reiterated | FUR | Jun 16, 2008, 11:32 am |
| Bare Walls In Reiterated | Condo Ins Producer | Jun 16, 2008, 10:35 am |
| RE: Who wrote this article - YOU ARE WRONG and YOUR INFO IS | Author! Author! | Jun 12, 2008, 1:33 pm |
| RE: Bare Walls | GP | Jun 12, 2008, 9:08 am |
| Who wrote this article - YOU ARE WRONG and YOUR INFO IS WRON | Scott Henderson | Jun 10, 2008, 2:29 pm |
| need a new vision | Jun 9, 2008, 9:31 pm |
|
| RE: Bare Walls | underwriter | Jun 9, 2008, 7:48 pm |
| Bare Walls | Retired | Jun 9, 2008, 4:25 pm |
| RE: RE: MD agents need a new vision | RRB | Jun 6, 2008, 7:53 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: MD agents need a new vision | underwriter | Jun 6, 2008, 7:59 am |
| RE: MD agents need a new vision | Scott | Jun 6, 2008, 7:19 am |
| RE: RE: MD Agents are totally wrong | fur | Jun 5, 2008, 9:13 am |
| RE: MD Agents are totally wrong | Good Hands | Jun 4, 2008, 4:06 pm |
| RE: RE: MD Agents are totally wrong | John Scrader | Jun 4, 2008, 11:54 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: MD agents need a new vision | Larry | Jun 4, 2008, 11:35 am |
| RE: MD Agents are totally wrong | fur | Jun 4, 2008, 9:10 am |
| MD Agents are totally wrong | John Scrader | Jun 4, 2008, 8:54 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: MD agents need a new vision | Condo Agent | Jun 4, 2008, 7:40 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: MD agents need a new vision | SP | Jun 3, 2008, 5:18 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: MD agents need a new vision | company person | Jun 3, 2008, 4:17 pm |
| RE: RE: MD agents need a new vision | FUR | Jun 3, 2008, 3:43 pm |
| RE: MD agents need a new vision | Condo Agent | Jun 3, 2008, 2:42 pm |
| MD agents need a new vision | Smitty | Jun 3, 2008, 2:29 pm |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: MD agents need a new vision
Did the association fully disclose the divisions? Do they provide documents that the unit owners can rely on in order to purchase their individual policies, do they discuss coverages, recommended limits?
The documents represent the MINIMUM responsibility of the condo association. That does not preclude purchasing broader coverage. If the association purchased all in coverage, paid the premium, assessed its members then they are due that coverage.
Does the policy specifically state that it only responds to the condo documents? Are the documents a part of the policy? A waranty of coverage? If not, the contract stands on its merits.
BTW, I have yet to lose this argument. But,then again I work with very reputable markets. Not markets that look first for a way to weasel out of paying claims.