East News

Viewing comments for:

Court Turns Maryland Condo Insurance Upside Down

East News • June 3, 2008
A dispute over $6,400 in damage to a Maryland townhouse led to an unexpected court decision that has reversed 26 years of standard industry practice, and left insurers, agents, lawmakers and ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: RE: Bare Walls

Posted On: June 19, 2008, 9:02 am CDT
Posted By: Ins
Comment:
Hey Retired.

I agree, it's no wander agents get sued.

Here is the insurance section of the law requiring the association to insure real property - including the unit (I can't make this up, it's in the statute):

11-114. Required insurance coverage; reconstruction.

(a) Duty of council of unit owners to maintain property and liability insurance.- Commencing not later than the time of the first conveyance of a unit to a person other than the developer, the council of unit owners shall maintain, to the extent reasonably available:

(1) Property insurance on the common elements and units, exclusive of improvements and betterments installed in units by unit owners, insuring against those risks of direct physical loss commonly insured against, in amounts determined by the council of unit owners but not less than any amounts specified in the declaration or bylaws;


It's an original specifications wording, as is the Uniform Condominium Act.

What you are talking about is the definition of a unit, this spells out who has to insure it. Notice the phrase "...the common elements and units..."
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: RE: MD Agents are totally wrong Condo Writer
Jul 10, 2008, 8:23 pm
RE: RE: RE: MD Agents are totally wrong Don
Jul 10, 2008, 7:53 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Bare Walls Interested
Jun 19, 2008, 9:09 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Bare Walls Scott
Jun 19, 2008, 9:06 am
RE: RE: RE: Bare Walls Ins
Jun 19, 2008, 9:02 am
RE: RE: Bare Walls Retired
Jun 19, 2008, 8:46 am
RE: Bare Walls Ins
Jun 19, 2008, 7:46 am
RE: Condo Policy vs Master Policy rrb
Jun 16, 2008, 12:56 pm
RE: Bare Walls In Reiterated FUR
Jun 16, 2008, 11:32 am
Bare Walls In Reiterated Condo Ins Producer
Jun 16, 2008, 10:35 am
RE: Who wrote this article - YOU ARE WRONG and YOUR INFO IS Author! Author!
Jun 12, 2008, 1:33 pm
RE: Bare Walls GP
Jun 12, 2008, 9:08 am
Who wrote this article - YOU ARE WRONG and YOUR INFO IS WRON Scott Henderson
Jun 10, 2008, 2:29 pm
need a new vision
Jun 9, 2008, 9:31 pm
RE: Bare Walls underwriter
Jun 9, 2008, 7:48 pm
Bare Walls Retired
Jun 9, 2008, 4:25 pm
RE: RE: MD agents need a new vision RRB
Jun 6, 2008, 7:53 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: MD agents need a new vision underwriter
Jun 6, 2008, 7:59 am
RE: MD agents need a new vision Scott
Jun 6, 2008, 7:19 am
RE: RE: MD Agents are totally wrong fur
Jun 5, 2008, 9:13 am
RE: MD Agents are totally wrong Good Hands
Jun 4, 2008, 4:06 pm
RE: RE: MD Agents are totally wrong John Scrader
Jun 4, 2008, 11:54 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: MD agents need a new vision Larry
Jun 4, 2008, 11:35 am
RE: MD Agents are totally wrong fur
Jun 4, 2008, 9:10 am
MD Agents are totally wrong John Scrader
Jun 4, 2008, 8:54 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: MD agents need a new vision Condo Agent
Jun 4, 2008, 7:40 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: MD agents need a new vision SP
Jun 3, 2008, 5:18 pm
RE: RE: RE: MD agents need a new vision company person
Jun 3, 2008, 4:17 pm
RE: RE: MD agents need a new vision FUR
Jun 3, 2008, 3:43 pm
RE: MD agents need a new vision Condo Agent
Jun 3, 2008, 2:42 pm
MD agents need a new vision Smitty
Jun 3, 2008, 2:29 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.