East News

Viewing comments for:

Vermont Diocese with $8.7M Abuse Verdict Can't Find Insurance Policy

East News • June 23, 2008
Many Roman Catholics believe that the worst of the clergy sex abuse scandal is over. But in the Diocese of Burlington, it's deepening. The case of one cleric, assigned to Vermont parishes in the ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Look at point 3 again

Posted On: June 24, 2008, 8:40 am CDT
Posted By: BGD
Comment:
The reason that people are coming forward now has more to do with point 3 -- anger over discovery of the scope of the problem -- than a desire for cash.

If you watch or read any of the stories about the priest sex abuse scandal, many of these people thought that they were basically alone, especially since the church basically blew off the complaints that were raised to diocese officials at the time. There is power in numbers, especially when you have been carrying an especially painful and private secret for a very long time. When the scandal hit the press, may people felt empowered to talk about it when they did not before.

As far as the money, I think most of them are motivated by a desire to see changes made an acknowledgement of wrongdoing. Also, as to punitive damages in many states, the government takes a portion of the proceeds. I would also be suprised if you see many of these victims living high on the hog with whatever money they get. And if they do, so what? I wasn't molested by a priest, he was.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: No nancy
Jun 25, 2008, 4:04 pm
Think about some solutions. Here's a start. Roy
Jun 24, 2008, 2:16 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: No Jenn
Jun 24, 2008, 9:36 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: No David
Jun 24, 2008, 9:11 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: No TP
Jun 24, 2008, 8:50 am
Look at point 3 again BGD
Jun 24, 2008, 8:40 am
RE: A few comments Sandra
Jun 24, 2008, 8:31 am
A few comments BGD
Jun 24, 2008, 8:01 am
RE: RE: RE: No - lastbat response Sandra
Jun 24, 2008, 7:56 am
RE: RE: No - lastbat response lastbat
Jun 24, 2008, 12:17 am
RE: No - lastbat response RG
Jun 23, 2008, 5:25 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: No lastbat
Jun 23, 2008, 3:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: No Jenn
Jun 23, 2008, 3:34 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: No TP
Jun 23, 2008, 2:54 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: No RM
Jun 23, 2008, 2:50 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: No TP
Jun 23, 2008, 2:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: No RG
Jun 23, 2008, 2:23 pm
RE: RE: RE: No Ric
Jun 23, 2008, 2:18 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: No LJS
Jun 23, 2008, 2:16 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: No TP
Jun 23, 2008, 2:15 pm
RE: RE: RE: No Eli
Jun 23, 2008, 1:56 pm
RE: RE: No Alan
Jun 23, 2008, 1:48 pm
RE: RE: No Jenn
Jun 23, 2008, 1:41 pm
RE: No LJS
Jun 23, 2008, 1:36 pm
No "Compensation' Dread
Jun 23, 2008, 1:16 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.