Posted On: December 2, 2008, 3:08 pm CST

Posted By: somebody important

Such logic as that posted by 'nobody important' is nothing short of incomprehensible.
MADD "haters"??? Simply because someone disagrees with another's methods, or questions their motives, means they "hate" them?!?!?
Perhaps a more accurate description than "MADD hater" would be "U.S. Constitution lover"! (see duiblog.com)
Another leap of logic is to characterize someone (me) who has genuine legal and constitutional concerns about some of the legislation sponsored by MADD (et al) as "pro-drunk"!!! Apparently there are some who believe that this foolish little obstacle called the U.S Constitution and the Bill of Rights can be removed, so that we may finally have Utopia, where all risk and danger is outlawed and there won't be any criminals because, of course, crime will be outlawed. Oh, and finally, all who dissent or object will be rightfully labeled "haters" or "pro-bad-something" and summarily executed along with anyone accused of anything! (by government officials who, as we all know, are above reproach and not subject to human weaknesses such as greed, dishonesty, abuse of power, etc - who needs these little nuisances like "checks and balances" and "due process" anyway?)
I did like the "bottoms up" part, but I don't drink, and I have no way of knowing whether 'disingenous' does either...hmmm, maybe nobody important is drinking alone...