Home > Talkback
Midwest News

Viewing comments for:

Truck Insurer Ordered to Pay for Plane Damage Under Michigan No-Fault Law

Midwest News • December 22, 2005
Two courts in Michigan have ruled that the insurer of a truck must pay $18,000 for damage caused to a small airplane that crashed after clipping the truck as the pilot tried to land in a grassy ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Thankful not to live in Michigan

Posted On: December 23, 2005, 8:54 am CST
Posted By: Dewy, Cheetum & Howe
Comment:
Of course Campos thinks their "no fault" law is a good one; he just made $48,000 defending a liability claim that should have been a subro claim! I thought no fault meant both parties pay for their own losses untill some threashold is breached where normal tort law takes over. The best way to repeal a bad law is to vigerously enforce it. In the mean time; my sympathies to the sane people held prisioner in the Peoples Republic of Michigan
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: Insurance Adjusters WEB
Dec 27, 2005, 1:12 pm
RE: Insurance Adjusters Buckeye
Dec 27, 2005, 9:57 am
Insurance Adjusters David
Dec 27, 2005, 9:34 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Thankful not to live in Michigan Buckeye
Dec 27, 2005, 8:23 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Thankful not to live in Michigan WEB
Dec 26, 2005, 8:56 am
RE: RE: RE: Thankful not to live in Michigan DD
Dec 26, 2005, 6:46 am
RE: RE: Thankful not to live in Michigan WEB
Dec 24, 2005, 10:37 am
RE: Thankful not to live in Michigan Brummiejim
Dec 23, 2005, 11:10 am
Thankful not to live in Michigan Dewy, Cheetum & Howe
Dec 23, 2005, 8:54 am
RE: RE: It just encourages them Buckeye
Dec 23, 2005, 8:19 am
RE: It just encourages them DD
Dec 23, 2005, 6:17 am
It just encourages them LL
Dec 22, 2005, 10:47 pm
re falling object Tass
Dec 22, 2005, 7:48 pm
RE: RE: Michigan Big Mike in CALI
Dec 22, 2005, 2:57 pm
RE: Michigan What about the truck driver?
Dec 22, 2005, 2:34 pm
RE: Michigan Precedent?
Dec 22, 2005, 2:30 pm
Michigan Kevin Raz
Dec 22, 2005, 2:09 pm
Indemnity vs. expense Company guy
Dec 22, 2005, 2:03 pm
RE: RE: TRUCK INSURER Bob Barrett
Dec 22, 2005, 1:10 pm
DeGraws grant
Dec 22, 2005, 1:05 pm
RE: TRUCK INSURER Simple Math
Dec 22, 2005, 12:36 pm
TRUCK INSURER Confused
Dec 22, 2005, 8:31 am
A joke right? dumbfounded
Dec 22, 2005, 8:27 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.