Midwest News
Viewing comments for:
Truck Insurer Ordered to Pay for Plane Damage Under Michigan No-Fault Law
Midwest News • December 22, 2005
Two courts in Michigan have ruled that the insurer of a truck must pay $18,000 for damage caused to a small airplane that crashed after clipping the truck as the pilot tried to land in a grassy ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: Insurance Adjusters | WEB | Dec 27, 2005, 1:12 pm |
| RE: Insurance Adjusters | Buckeye | Dec 27, 2005, 9:57 am |
| Insurance Adjusters | David | Dec 27, 2005, 9:34 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Thankful not to live in Michigan | Buckeye | Dec 27, 2005, 8:23 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Thankful not to live in Michigan | WEB | Dec 26, 2005, 8:56 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Thankful not to live in Michigan | DD | Dec 26, 2005, 6:46 am |
| RE: RE: Thankful not to live in Michigan | WEB | Dec 24, 2005, 10:37 am |
| RE: Thankful not to live in Michigan | Brummiejim | Dec 23, 2005, 11:10 am |
| Thankful not to live in Michigan | Dewy, Cheetum & Howe | Dec 23, 2005, 8:54 am |
| RE: RE: It just encourages them | Buckeye | Dec 23, 2005, 8:19 am |
| RE: It just encourages them | DD | Dec 23, 2005, 6:17 am |
| It just encourages them | LL | Dec 22, 2005, 10:47 pm |
| re falling object | Tass | Dec 22, 2005, 7:48 pm |
| RE: RE: Michigan | Big Mike in CALI | Dec 22, 2005, 2:57 pm |
| RE: Michigan | What about the truck driver? | Dec 22, 2005, 2:34 pm |
| RE: Michigan | Precedent? | Dec 22, 2005, 2:30 pm |
| Michigan | Kevin Raz | Dec 22, 2005, 2:09 pm |
| Indemnity vs. expense | Company guy | Dec 22, 2005, 2:03 pm |
| RE: RE: TRUCK INSURER | Bob Barrett | Dec 22, 2005, 1:10 pm |
| DeGraws | grant | Dec 22, 2005, 1:05 pm |
| RE: TRUCK INSURER | Simple Math | Dec 22, 2005, 12:36 pm |
| TRUCK INSURER | Confused | Dec 22, 2005, 8:31 am |
| A joke right? | dumbfounded | Dec 22, 2005, 8:27 am |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Thankful not to live in Michigan
There is a law that controls all airplane having an engine problem. It is the Law of Gavity and it always wins. Your comment on "Who cares if the plane was having engine problems" seems to me to not understand this law.
From the insurance company and truck driver prospective it would be called "Bad Law", but form the airplane pilots perpective, it seems like "Good Law".
Of all the conclusions that have been formed in these replies, the only one that makes sense is the comment,that from a dollars and cents standpoint, the cost to the insurance company and the truck owner didn't make any sense to defend this case.
It is great to live in Michigan and Merry Christmas.
WEB