Midwest News

Viewing comments for:

Minn. Supreme Court Considers Attorney Requirement on Malpractice Insurance

Midwest News • May 16, 2006
Many of the complaints the Minnesota Lawyers Board investigates get dismissed, including a large number filed by clients upset simply because their attorney lost, according to an Associated Press ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: RE: Honest Lawyers

Posted On: May 18, 2006, 9:35 am CDT
Posted By: I will take my chances on
Comment:
I will take my chances on insurance type people over attorneys any day when it comes to honesty. I have had over 20 years experience with both and although I know there are "bad ones" in the insurance industry, I guess I have been fortunate to have worked at companies that did not look at how to get out of paying claims but to process them if the coverage was there and there was no fraud involved (there is alot of that you know). On the other hand, those same 20 years gave me many experiences with attorneys as well and when they know there are pockets out there to empty, regardless of whether or not there is cause, they do their best to do so without thought of the word indemnity and how it relates to insurance and losses. Yes there are some good attorneys but in my experience, there are more out there looking out for their own greedy selves than those who are truly trying to help the insured or claimant as they claim to be doing. Attorneys who scavenge policies to try and find loopholes and then advertise them on TV to get the free lunch bums to come on in and file suits
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: Honest Lawyers I will take my chances on
May 18, 2006, 9:35 am
RE: RE: Honest Lawyers stu
May 18, 2006, 8:51 am
RE: Honest Lawyers You took the words , , , ,
May 17, 2006, 1:10 pm
Honest Lawyers Kevin Raz
May 17, 2006, 12:37 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.