Midwest News

Viewing comments for:

Mich. House Passes Controversial Motorcycle Helmet Repeal Bill

Midwest News • June 7, 2006
With hundreds of motorcycle riders outside the Capitol, the Michigan state House today passed a controversial repeal of a mandate for riders to wear helmets. The legislation passed by a 66-37 vote ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: RE: will it save money

Posted On: June 20, 2006, 7:12 pm CDT
Posted By: Ray Henke
Comment:
When bank robber Willie Sutton was asked why he robbed banks, he replied "Because that is where the money is."

You may review my previous comment below with regard to the death statistics commonly cited in support of helmet legislation. But most important to the last two postings is that head injury and death statistics, even if credited are merely a drop in the bucket in terms of the panoply of motorcyclist injury which combines to define the state public health crisis and fiscal concerns asserted by the state's in support of helmet laws. The states have for too long pretended that they are doing something meaningful to reduce motorcyclist injury, when bank robber Willie Sutton would laugh with disdain, as anyone who looks at the statistics recognizes that the enactment of helmet laws is no more than robbing a convenience store, while ignoring the bank next door, filled with all of the caskets and gurneys filled with bikers who have suffered debilitating or fatal internal injuries, paralyzed, faced with life long medical and convalescent or nursing care, with their limbs amputated, and with catastrophic orthopedic injuries, unable again to return to their professions.
This panoply of motorcyclist injury is what defines the public health crisis, and it also defines the state fiscal crisis, just because the auto drivers responsible for the vast majority of multi-vehicle motorcycle accidents are both underinsured to pay for the injuries and medical expense they cause, and are unwilling personally to take responsibility to pay the expense they've caused above the limits of their insurance policies.
So, where is the bank? The bank is in reducing the incidence of multi-vehicle motorcycle accidents, fully 2/3 of which are caused solely the result of auto driver negligence, without any fault at all on the part of the biker. That is where the money is. The vast majority of such accidents result specifically from auto driver inattention to motorcyclists at intersections, the remainder, lane change and rear end accidents caused by auto drivers.
If we want to solve the real, big public health issue, represented by the full panoply of motorcyclist injury, and substantially reduce the state fiscal consequence of motorcycle accidents and the injuries sustained by both helmeted and unhelmeted bikers alike, then the answer is not in robbing convenience stores, it is not in helmet legislation. The solution is mandatory auto driver education on motorcycle safety issues, and in particular on the motorcycle accident avoidance strategies which auto drivers must employ for the protection of bikers. There needs to be a well funded motorcycle awareness campaign to inform auto drivers of the importance particularly of opening their eyes and looking for the oncoming motorcyclist at intersections in particular. And the state should adopt penalty legislation, specifically, either substantial drivers license suspensions or jail time for auto drivers who recklessly or inattentively injure or kill a motorcyclist (because at the moment auto drivers don't attend to bikers, primarily because they don't see them as a threat to them in the same way they see cars as a threat to them, and so penalty legislation is needed so that they will get it, that crippling or killing a biker will affect them personally.)
That's where the money is, my friends, so lets not pretend that helmets are the panacea either for the public health crisis or the state fiscal concerns. Lets recognize that our auto driving state legislators just see dictating what bikers wear as a way to pretend, for their political reasons, that they are doing something about these issues when in fact they are not. Instead, lets actually do something positive for a change to reduce motorcyclist injury across the board, the full panoply of injury, among helmeted and unhelmeted bikers alike. And at the same time provide the state meaningful relief for a change, from the costs it must bear when auto drivers refuse to pay for the injuries they cause.
Ride safe, my friends, or as we at Motorcyclists Against Dumb Drivers would say, "Ride Smart Until the Dumb Drivers Get Smart."
M-A-D-D Ray Henke
Motorcyclists Against Dumb Drivers
http://www.motorcyclists-against-dumb-drivers.com
Subject Posted By Posted On
Insurance company corruption Capt-Bly
Nov 22, 2006, 10:42 am
RE: Do Not Resucitate david
Oct 29, 2006, 10:56 am
RE: Insurance company corruption jim
Jul 18, 2006, 10:44 am
RE: RE: Let those who ride decide! Archie
Jul 13, 2006, 8:36 pm
RE: Let those who ride decide! John Burgeson
Jul 9, 2006, 7:11 pm
Dean Whittier is another person penalizing the victims CAPT. BLY
Jul 1, 2006, 9:26 am
Agree with Thomas Kerr Dean Whittier
Jun 30, 2006, 10:02 pm
RE: RE: Democratic Riders for Devoss larry
Jun 26, 2006, 8:22 pm
RE: Democratic Riders for Devoss Bigguy
Jun 26, 2006, 9:03 am
Democratic Riders for Devoss David Rivard
Jun 25, 2006, 12:08 pm
Irresponsible actions -- criminal and civil sanctions? Capt. Bly
Jun 25, 2006, 1:22 am
RE: RE: RE: will it save money Ray Henke
Jun 20, 2006, 7:12 pm
RE: RE: will it save money larry
Jun 20, 2006, 6:01 pm
RE: will it save money Allan
Jun 20, 2006, 9:52 am
RE: RE: But will it save money? Tim Sullivan
Jun 19, 2006, 8:27 pm
Right On Capt Bly! Let the Inattentive Auto Drivers Pay! Ray Henke
Jun 19, 2006, 4:54 am
Let the inattentive Drivers pay! Capt. Bly
Jun 18, 2006, 11:28 pm
will it save money larry
Jun 17, 2006, 9:31 am
RE: But will it save money? Thomas Kerr
Jun 17, 2006, 8:01 am
RE: Insurance company corruption Wheels
Jun 14, 2006, 1:26 pm
No helmet, no coverage Brian
Jun 14, 2006, 7:33 am
Helmet Law Repeal is Essential for Motorcyclist Safety Ray Henke
Jun 14, 2006, 4:45 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Evil Knievel and Indian Larry NoSpokes
Jun 13, 2006, 10:48 pm
RE: RE: RE: Evil Knievel and Indian Larry larry
Jun 13, 2006, 9:54 pm
RE: Where's the beef? Live Free or Die
Jun 13, 2006, 4:49 pm
RE: Live Free or Die wjk
Jun 13, 2006, 3:45 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Responsiblity Cheaper to let ... decide
Jun 13, 2006, 10:48 am
Where's the beef? Live Free or Die
Jun 13, 2006, 9:32 am
RE: RE: Evil Knievel and Indian Larry Allan
Jun 13, 2006, 8:52 am
RE: Evil Knievel and Indian Larry Noob Saibot
Jun 13, 2006, 7:27 am
Evil Knievel and Indian Larry NoSpokes
Jun 13, 2006, 12:55 am
Pittsburg QB Wannabe
Jun 12, 2006, 3:01 pm
RE: RE: Car Drivers Should Wear Them Too Tom Monticup
Jun 12, 2006, 10:46 am
RE: Ins. rates only inflate Still Alive
Jun 12, 2006, 10:24 am
RE: Ins. rates only inflate jayb
Jun 9, 2006, 6:25 pm
RE: RE: Fine ... as long as I don't pay for it Brett
Jun 9, 2006, 12:36 pm
Crap poo
Jun 8, 2006, 11:29 pm
RE: Fine ... as long as I don't pay for it
Jun 8, 2006, 9:13 pm
RE: helmet only good up to 15 mph. anyway S. Shank
Jun 8, 2006, 8:29 pm
Ins. rates only inflate Whiny witch
Jun 8, 2006, 7:06 pm
Helmet Gord
Jun 8, 2006, 5:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: Responsiblity Live Free or Die
Jun 8, 2006, 3:02 pm
RE: RE: Responsiblity Growing Old for a Reason
Jun 8, 2006, 2:49 pm
RE: Responsiblity wjk
Jun 8, 2006, 2:25 pm
Responsiblity A Veteran
Jun 8, 2006, 1:36 pm
Pay to play insurance purchaser
Jun 8, 2006, 1:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: Let those who ride decide! Live Free or Die
Jun 8, 2006, 1:18 pm
RE: RE: RE: Let those who ride decide! No Helmet Wearer
Jun 8, 2006, 1:06 pm
RE: RE: Let those who ride decide! Live Free or Die
Jun 8, 2006, 1:00 pm
RE: RE: Let those who ride decide! Mike J
Jun 8, 2006, 12:55 pm
Insurance companies... Eric
Jun 8, 2006, 12:51 pm
RE: Let those who ride decide! No Helmet Rider
Jun 8, 2006, 12:10 pm
Let those who ride decide! Dawn
Jun 8, 2006, 10:01 am
Safe drivers lower Insurance costs not after thoughts Lucky
Jun 8, 2006, 9:56 am
MC riders Pay Max
Jun 8, 2006, 9:43 am
RE: Car Drivers Should Wear Them Too Rich
Jun 8, 2006, 9:12 am
Car Drivers Should Wear Them Too Lane
Jun 8, 2006, 8:24 am
Insurance company corruption Rob
Jun 8, 2006, 12:08 am
But will it save money? Mike F
Jun 7, 2006, 11:05 pm
Do Not Resucitate Chris
Jun 7, 2006, 10:45 pm
Fine ... as long as I don't pay for it Brett
Jun 7, 2006, 10:38 pm
Jun 7, 2006, 10:35 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.