Midwest News
Viewing comments for:
Group Sues Michigan State University Over Same-sex Benefits
Midwest News • July 7, 2006
A conservative group this week filed suit to stop Michigan State University from offering health insurance to the partners of gay workers and said the school is violating a 2004 amendment to the ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat: | Wheels | Jul 12, 2006, 5:58 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat: | PAt | Jul 12, 2006, 2:47 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat: | Wheels | Jul 12, 2006, 2:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat: | Pat | Jul 11, 2006, 2:23 pm |
| RE: Keep it up! | Pat | Jul 11, 2006, 1:08 pm |
| Keep it up! | Little Frog | Jul 11, 2006, 12:49 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat: | Misty Meanor | Jul 10, 2006, 4:33 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Pat: | Pat | Jul 10, 2006, 3:51 pm |
| RE: RE: Pat: | Misty Meanor | Jul 10, 2006, 3:38 pm |
| RE: Pat: | Pat | Jul 10, 2006, 8:55 am |
| Pat: | Little frog | Jul 10, 2006, 8:44 am |
| RE: to Pat: | Pat | Jul 10, 2006, 7:46 am |
| to Pat: | pdd | Jul 7, 2006, 4:46 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why stop there? | sleepydogg | Jul 7, 2006, 4:08 pm |
| RE: Why stop there? | Pat | Jul 7, 2006, 2:56 pm |
| RE: Why stop there? | puh-LEASE! | Jul 7, 2006, 2:40 pm |
| RE: Why stop there? | Comment | Jul 7, 2006, 2:30 pm |
| Why stop there? | Pat | Jul 7, 2006, 1:22 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: to Pat:
The point of marriage is not fringe benefits. So What? Maybe Michiganders don't want to pay for bennies for buggers. Just a thought. And no one will answer whether three women should be allowed to marry to get bennies, when a simple Yes or No would do. Why the reticence?
"If I were you I would target the Muslims. They appear to be more of a threat than gays. After all, they are not Christians and have already shown their distain for western civilization."
People who advocate gay "marriage" are not Christian either, but they are equally as destructive to our civilization as the terrorists are. Then again, I have yet to base my opinion on any religious point. You are so anti-Christiant that you leap at the chance to call them names, despoite the merely rational basis for my position.
So should three women be allowed to marry, and if not, why not?