Midwest News
Viewing comments for:
Group Sues Michigan State University Over Same-sex Benefits
Midwest News July 7, 2006
A conservative group this week filed suit to stop Michigan State University from offering health insurance to the partners of gay workers and said the school is violating a 2004 amendment to the ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat: | Wheels | Jul 12, 2006, 5:58 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat: | PAt | Jul 12, 2006, 2:47 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat: | Wheels | Jul 12, 2006, 2:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat: | Pat | Jul 11, 2006, 2:23 pm |
| RE: Keep it up! | Pat | Jul 11, 2006, 1:08 pm |
| Keep it up! | Little Frog | Jul 11, 2006, 12:49 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat: | Misty Meanor | Jul 10, 2006, 4:33 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Pat: | Pat | Jul 10, 2006, 3:51 pm |
| RE: RE: Pat: | Misty Meanor | Jul 10, 2006, 3:38 pm |
| RE: Pat: | Pat | Jul 10, 2006, 8:55 am |
| Pat: | Little frog | Jul 10, 2006, 8:44 am |
| RE: to Pat: | Pat | Jul 10, 2006, 7:46 am |
| to Pat: | pdd | Jul 7, 2006, 4:46 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Why stop there? | sleepydogg | Jul 7, 2006, 4:08 pm |
| RE: Why stop there? | Pat | Jul 7, 2006, 2:56 pm |
| RE: Why stop there? | puh-LEASE! | Jul 7, 2006, 2:40 pm |
| RE: Why stop there? | Comment | Jul 7, 2006, 2:30 pm |
| Why stop there? | Pat | Jul 7, 2006, 1:22 pm |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat:
I consider a marriage between a man and a woman that lasts less than 6 months more of an insult to the "institution of marriage" than three committed women being allowed to marry.
Marriage is what you make of it, and to me it is a lifetime commitment. I really don't care if a guy wants to marry a guy, a woman, two women, etc. As long as they are willing and devoted, let them live their lives and receive the benefits they deserve.
About half of all marriages end in divorce these days, which says the "institution of marriage" already isn't what it was in the past. Maybe allowing an individual to decide for themselves,instead of everyone else, whom they will marry should be the way of things.
Considering that people are more willing to accept the marriage of an unsuccessful, uneducated drunk who beats his wife and molests his kids simply because he is a man married to a woman, allowing two committed, financially stable men to marry seems the better option.
Who knows, maybe the gay marriages will be healthier than the hetero marriages?