Midwest News

Viewing comments for:

Group Sues Michigan State University Over Same-sex Benefits

Midwest News • July 7, 2006
A conservative group this week filed suit to stop Michigan State University from offering health insurance to the partners of gay workers and said the school is violating a 2004 amendment to the ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat:

Posted On: July 12, 2006, 2:21 pm CDT
Posted By: Wheels
Comment:
I think three women should be able to get married if they want to.

I consider a marriage between a man and a woman that lasts less than 6 months more of an insult to the "institution of marriage" than three committed women being allowed to marry.

Marriage is what you make of it, and to me it is a lifetime commitment. I really don't care if a guy wants to marry a guy, a woman, two women, etc. As long as they are willing and devoted, let them live their lives and receive the benefits they deserve.

About half of all marriages end in divorce these days, which says the "institution of marriage" already isn't what it was in the past. Maybe allowing an individual to decide for themselves,instead of everyone else, whom they will marry should be the way of things.

Considering that people are more willing to accept the marriage of an unsuccessful, uneducated drunk who beats his wife and molests his kids simply because he is a man married to a woman, allowing two committed, financially stable men to marry seems the better option.

Who knows, maybe the gay marriages will be healthier than the hetero marriages?
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat: Wheels
Jul 12, 2006, 5:58 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat: PAt
Jul 12, 2006, 2:47 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat: Wheels
Jul 12, 2006, 2:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat: Pat
Jul 11, 2006, 2:23 pm
RE: Keep it up! Pat
Jul 11, 2006, 1:08 pm
Keep it up! Little Frog
Jul 11, 2006, 12:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Pat: Misty Meanor
Jul 10, 2006, 4:33 pm
RE: RE: RE: Pat: Pat
Jul 10, 2006, 3:51 pm
RE: RE: Pat: Misty Meanor
Jul 10, 2006, 3:38 pm
RE: Pat: Pat
Jul 10, 2006, 8:55 am
Pat: Little frog
Jul 10, 2006, 8:44 am
RE: to Pat: Pat
Jul 10, 2006, 7:46 am
to Pat: pdd
Jul 7, 2006, 4:46 pm
RE: RE: RE: Why stop there? sleepydogg
Jul 7, 2006, 4:08 pm
RE: Why stop there? Pat
Jul 7, 2006, 2:56 pm
RE: Why stop there? puh-LEASE!
Jul 7, 2006, 2:40 pm
RE: Why stop there? Comment
Jul 7, 2006, 2:30 pm
Why stop there? Pat
Jul 7, 2006, 1:22 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.