Midwest News
Viewing comments for:
Ind. Company Plans to Charge Workers for Unhealthy Habits
Midwest News July 5, 2007
Unhealthy habits could cost Clarian Health employees a healthy chunk of money as the company tries to rein in rising health care costs.
Starting in 2009, Clarian will begin charging workers extra ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Hate is bad for your health, Al. | Al | Jul 10, 2007, 3:38 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Hate is bad for your health, Al. | Mary B. | Jul 10, 2007, 3:20 pm |
| RE: RE: Hate is bad for your health, Al. | Al | Jul 10, 2007, 7:46 am |
| RE: Hate is bad for your health, Al. | Mary B. | Jul 9, 2007, 3:33 pm |
| RE: Hate is bad for your health, Al. | Al | Jul 9, 2007, 9:57 am |
| Hate is bad for your health, Al. | Smiling | Jul 9, 2007, 9:34 am |
| RE: RE: Expensive employees | Al | Jul 9, 2007, 8:35 am |
| RE: RE: Expensive employees | Al | Jul 9, 2007, 8:30 am |
| size twelve for women | same size as Marilyn | Jul 6, 2007, 1:22 pm |
| RE: Expensive employees | Tired of the Bull | Jul 6, 2007, 1:18 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Expensive employees | Nobody Important | Jul 6, 2007, 11:54 am |
| Two sided.... | Hmm... | Jul 6, 2007, 11:36 am |
| RE: RE: Big Brother | Nobody Important | Jul 6, 2007, 10:03 am |
| RE: Big Brother | Anon | Jul 6, 2007, 9:19 am |
| RE: Big Brother | Nobody Important | Jul 6, 2007, 9:08 am |
| Big Brother | Liberal Media | Jul 6, 2007, 8:45 am |
| RE: Liberties | Anon | Jul 6, 2007, 8:13 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Expensive employees | Mike | Jul 5, 2007, 4:23 pm |
| Liberties | Bush Hater | Jul 5, 2007, 4:19 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Expensive employees | Kay | Jul 5, 2007, 2:31 pm |
| Missed Liberties | plymn | Jul 5, 2007, 2:00 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Expensive employees | Smitty | Jul 5, 2007, 1:48 pm |
| AL | Midwest | Jul 5, 2007, 1:42 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Expensive employees | Kay | Jul 5, 2007, 1:36 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Expensive employees | By who's measure? | Jul 5, 2007, 1:32 pm |
| RE: RE: Expensive employees | Al | Jul 5, 2007, 1:23 pm |
| RE: RE: Expensive employees | Al | Jul 5, 2007, 1:21 pm |
| RE: Expensive employees | LAM | Jul 5, 2007, 1:19 pm |
| RE: Expensive employees | SJW | Jul 5, 2007, 1:17 pm |
| Expensive employees | Al | Jul 5, 2007, 12:57 pm |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Expensive employees
2. Where are your statistics on gay women as your original post did not state gay men only "the gays"?
3. Not all children contribute to society - and "the gays" continue to support services for them by paying the same taxes despite not having their children attend (or be accepted) at schools, not having teenagers destroying others property ect.
However, the point here is passing along additional charges to employees whos activities cost more in insurance premiums. Having a workforce that is reproducing costs more in insurance premiums. And, having employees with teenagers that are also reproducing (at an alarming rate) costs the employer more in insurance premiums as well.
As a lesbian women in her mid-30s, I have never needed my insurance carrier to pay for a hospital stay; most women in my age group have been in the hospital for one or two deliveries not to mention the dozen doctor appts leading up to the births, follow up visits and costs of birth control when they aren't reproducing.
You can't have it all ways - charge for those activities YOU feel are more hazardous/expensive while not recognizing that the lifestyle you subscribe to also has it's additional costs.