Home > Talkback
Midwest News

Viewing comments for:

Mo. Water Park Accident Leads to Bill Requiring Insurance

Midwest News • December 31, 2007
A state lawmaker is proposing legislation that would impose new regulations on for-profit private water parks, including the need for at least $1 million in liability insurance. The move comes ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Negligence & Risk

Posted On: January 2, 2008, 8:42 am CST
Posted By: Dread
Comment:
One must question the parents judgement allowing a 6 year old to go on a field trip to a swimming park in the first place. Regardless of what people think, swimming, or just playing in the water is dangerous. The park does not have the duty to guarantee 100% safety for people who use its facility. The primary responsibility lies with the parent, or the person/persons assigned to be responsible for the child. Even under the best circumstances it is impossible for lifeguards to see every person in a pool 100% of the time.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: Did she really say that? rooster
Feb 6, 2008, 11:01 am
insurance doesn't prevent criminal negligence Chad Balaamaba
Jan 2, 2008, 10:28 am
Negligence & Risk Dread
Jan 2, 2008, 8:42 am
RE: RE: Did she really say that? Retro Man
Jan 2, 2008, 7:14 am
RE: Did she really say that? Henry
Dec 31, 2007, 1:17 pm
Did she really say that? Mike
Dec 31, 2007, 1:03 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.