Midwest News

Viewing comments for:

Michigan Court Upholds Ban on Credit Scoring in Insurance

Midwest News • August 25, 2008
Insurance companies in Michigan no longer will be able to use customers' credit scores to set home and auto insurance premiums if a state Court of Appeals ruling stands. The 2-1 decision released ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RAD

Posted On: August 25, 2008, 12:59 pm CDT
Posted By: Reality
Comment:
Companies rate differently for multiple reasons, not just credit scores. To say that you rate the same risk in different companies and recieved different rates and blame that all on their credit scores is just plain ignorance. Everyone company has their own rating structure with different base rates and characteristic factors. They target their rates towards those customers they feel are the better risks.

Now for why I think credit scores and a very valid reason to rate. Other than the fact that it has statistically been proven that those with a lower credit score have higher loss ratios. What happens when someone repeatedly doesnt pay their insurance bill on time. The insurance company has to send out notices, follow-up with the customers, and follow many regualtions which may result in a policy cancellation. These things cost money. The policyholder that does pay their bill on time doesnt incure these expenses for the company. Also, if you don't pay your bills your not as likely to stay around as long. Anyone who has seen policy expenses knows that an insurance company doesnt really start making money on a policy until 4-5 years after it is sold. A higher rate for those that wont stay as long is justified. I wont even get into the higher chance of fraud with those customers who are having a hard time paying their bills and may just "lose" their car to get an insurance payout.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... caveat emptor
Aug 28, 2008, 9:28 am
this sentence is the problem caveat emptor
Aug 28, 2008, 9:19 am
rates Einstein
Aug 27, 2008, 3:39 pm
Credit Scoring Garry Lloyd
Aug 27, 2008, 3:19 pm
RE: RE: Reality? Challenged Creditee
Aug 27, 2008, 1:48 pm
RE: RE: Reality? Einstein
Aug 26, 2008, 11:37 am
RE: Reality? Ratemaker
Aug 26, 2008, 11:31 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? - B Ratemaker
Aug 26, 2008, 11:29 am
RE: Reality? nobody important
Aug 26, 2008, 11:09 am
Reality? Einstein
Aug 26, 2008, 10:57 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? nobody important
Aug 26, 2008, 10:23 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? B
Aug 26, 2008, 10:01 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? nobody important
Aug 26, 2008, 9:58 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? Dawn
Aug 26, 2008, 9:20 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? nobody important
Aug 26, 2008, 8:53 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? Dawn
Aug 26, 2008, 8:41 am
Dear underwriter Einstein
Aug 25, 2008, 8:05 pm
RE: RE: Firm Numbers Underwriter
Aug 25, 2008, 5:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? Reality
Aug 25, 2008, 3:40 pm
RE: RE: Lower rates for some? Dawn
Aug 25, 2008, 3:36 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? Nobody Important
Aug 25, 2008, 2:31 pm
Analyst Mr. Solvent
Aug 25, 2008, 2:03 pm
RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? Analyst
Aug 25, 2008, 1:59 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... No Bias Here
Aug 25, 2008, 1:51 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... John Scrader
Aug 25, 2008, 1:36 pm
RE: RE: Lower rates for some? Einstein
Aug 25, 2008, 1:35 pm
RE: RE: Try Another Approach Esad
Aug 25, 2008, 1:31 pm
RE: RE: Lower rates for some? Mr. Solvent
Aug 25, 2008, 1:29 pm
RE: Lower rates for some? Analyst
Aug 25, 2008, 1:17 pm
RE: Try Another Approach Mr. Solvent
Aug 25, 2008, 1:11 pm
RE: RAD Esad
Aug 25, 2008, 1:01 pm
Try Another Approach Think Differently
Aug 25, 2008, 1:00 pm
RE: RAD Reality
Aug 25, 2008, 12:59 pm
RAD Mr. Solvent
Aug 25, 2008, 12:50 pm
RE: RE: Firm Numbers Mr. Solvent
Aug 25, 2008, 12:48 pm
RE: Firm Numbers RAD
Aug 25, 2008, 12:47 pm
RE: RE: Firm Numbers Logical
Aug 25, 2008, 12:45 pm
RE: Firm Numbers Agree
Aug 25, 2008, 12:33 pm
RE: Firm Numbers Larry Erickson
Aug 25, 2008, 12:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... Larry Erickson
Aug 25, 2008, 12:20 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? SWFL Mark
Aug 25, 2008, 12:05 pm
RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? Mr. Solvent
Aug 25, 2008, 11:28 am
RE: RE: Lower rates for some? nobody important
Aug 25, 2008, 11:25 am
RE: Lower rates for some? Mr. Solvent
Aug 25, 2008, 11:20 am
Firm Numbers Mr. Solvent
Aug 25, 2008, 11:16 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... John Scrader
Aug 25, 2008, 11:10 am
Lower rates for some? low rate payer
Aug 25, 2008, 11:05 am
RE: RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... nobody important
Aug 25, 2008, 10:09 am
RE: RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... Ratemaker
Aug 25, 2008, 10:01 am
RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... Mr. Solvent
Aug 25, 2008, 9:35 am
RE: The problem with credit scoring.... nobody important
Aug 25, 2008, 9:15 am
GEICO & PGR Direct Rick
Aug 25, 2008, 9:00 am
The problem with credit scoring.... John Scrader
Aug 25, 2008, 8:34 am
Great State nobody important
Aug 25, 2008, 7:23 am
not "reasonably expected?!?!?!" Ratemaker
Aug 25, 2008, 7:06 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.