Midwest News
Viewing comments for:
Michigan Court Upholds Ban on Credit Scoring in Insurance
Midwest News August 25, 2008
Insurance companies in Michigan no longer will be able to use customers' credit scores to set home and auto insurance premiums if a state Court of Appeals ruling stands.
The 2-1 decision released ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... | caveat emptor | Aug 28, 2008, 9:28 am |
| this sentence is the problem | caveat emptor | Aug 28, 2008, 9:19 am |
| rates | Einstein | Aug 27, 2008, 3:39 pm |
| Credit Scoring | Garry Lloyd | Aug 27, 2008, 3:19 pm |
| RE: RE: Reality? | Challenged Creditee | Aug 27, 2008, 1:48 pm |
| RE: RE: Reality? | Einstein | Aug 26, 2008, 11:37 am |
| RE: Reality? | Ratemaker | Aug 26, 2008, 11:31 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? - B | Ratemaker | Aug 26, 2008, 11:29 am |
| RE: Reality? | nobody important | Aug 26, 2008, 11:09 am |
| Reality? | Einstein | Aug 26, 2008, 10:57 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? | nobody important | Aug 26, 2008, 10:23 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? | B | Aug 26, 2008, 10:01 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? | nobody important | Aug 26, 2008, 9:58 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? | Dawn | Aug 26, 2008, 9:20 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? | nobody important | Aug 26, 2008, 8:53 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? | Dawn | Aug 26, 2008, 8:41 am |
| Dear underwriter | Einstein | Aug 25, 2008, 8:05 pm |
| RE: RE: Firm Numbers | Underwriter | Aug 25, 2008, 5:09 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? | Reality | Aug 25, 2008, 3:40 pm |
| RE: RE: Lower rates for some? | Dawn | Aug 25, 2008, 3:36 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? | Nobody Important | Aug 25, 2008, 2:31 pm |
| Analyst | Mr. Solvent | Aug 25, 2008, 2:03 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? | Analyst | Aug 25, 2008, 1:59 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... | No Bias Here | Aug 25, 2008, 1:51 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... | John Scrader | Aug 25, 2008, 1:36 pm |
| RE: RE: Lower rates for some? | Einstein | Aug 25, 2008, 1:35 pm |
| RE: RE: Try Another Approach | Esad | Aug 25, 2008, 1:31 pm |
| RE: RE: Lower rates for some? | Mr. Solvent | Aug 25, 2008, 1:29 pm |
| RE: Lower rates for some? | Analyst | Aug 25, 2008, 1:17 pm |
| RE: Try Another Approach | Mr. Solvent | Aug 25, 2008, 1:11 pm |
| RE: RAD | Esad | Aug 25, 2008, 1:01 pm |
| Try Another Approach | Think Differently | Aug 25, 2008, 1:00 pm |
| RE: RAD | Reality | Aug 25, 2008, 12:59 pm |
| RAD | Mr. Solvent | Aug 25, 2008, 12:50 pm |
| RE: RE: Firm Numbers | Mr. Solvent | Aug 25, 2008, 12:48 pm |
| RE: Firm Numbers | RAD | Aug 25, 2008, 12:47 pm |
| RE: RE: Firm Numbers | Logical | Aug 25, 2008, 12:45 pm |
| RE: Firm Numbers | Agree | Aug 25, 2008, 12:33 pm |
| RE: Firm Numbers | Larry Erickson | Aug 25, 2008, 12:26 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... | Larry Erickson | Aug 25, 2008, 12:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? | SWFL Mark | Aug 25, 2008, 12:05 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Lower rates for some? | Mr. Solvent | Aug 25, 2008, 11:28 am |
| RE: RE: Lower rates for some? | nobody important | Aug 25, 2008, 11:25 am |
| RE: Lower rates for some? | Mr. Solvent | Aug 25, 2008, 11:20 am |
| Firm Numbers | Mr. Solvent | Aug 25, 2008, 11:16 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... | John Scrader | Aug 25, 2008, 11:10 am |
| Lower rates for some? | low rate payer | Aug 25, 2008, 11:05 am |
| RE: RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... | nobody important | Aug 25, 2008, 10:09 am |
| RE: RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... | Ratemaker | Aug 25, 2008, 10:01 am |
| RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring.... | Mr. Solvent | Aug 25, 2008, 9:35 am |
| RE: The problem with credit scoring.... | nobody important | Aug 25, 2008, 9:15 am |
| GEICO & PGR Direct | Rick | Aug 25, 2008, 9:00 am |
| The problem with credit scoring.... | John Scrader | Aug 25, 2008, 8:34 am |
| Great State | nobody important | Aug 25, 2008, 7:23 am |
| not "reasonably expected?!?!?!" | Ratemaker | Aug 25, 2008, 7:06 am |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The problem with credit scoring....
Let's say you have 2 credit cards, each with a 10k limit and you have one with 5000 on it because has a low interest rate and the other empty because you don't feel like paying the 30% they're asking for. Take that SAME 5000 in debt and put 2500 on EACH card and your credit score goes up by a MINIMUM of 100 points. Now how does this make any sense? Basically, the credit score rewards you for making a bad fiscal decision (paying more interest) because some random bean counter decided 50% card useage is a bad thing, no matter what. Ummm...here's a tip genius using 50% of ALL your cards is bad...using 50% of ONE card is not an indicator of your credit risk in any way (maybe you only want to make 1 payment, maybe that card has a pretty picture on it, who knows why a consumer prefers to use that card - certainly not the guy making up the credit score). I could give you dozens more examples of the faulty, circular logic built into credit scores but I have to get to work.