Midwest News
Viewing comments for:
$17M Jury Award Against American Family Mutual Reinstated
Midwest News • May 6, 2009
A Missouri appeals court has reinstated a $17 million jury award in a class action lawsuit against American Family Mutual Insurance Co. over aftermarket vehicle parts.
The Missouri Court of ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: wow, actually proud of my employer! | Dave | Oct 26, 2009, 1:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Wade Ebert | May 12, 2009, 9:17 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | hollywood | May 11, 2009, 9:39 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Wade Ebert | May 11, 2009, 2:39 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Defender of Justice | May 11, 2009, 2:25 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | hollywood | May 11, 2009, 1:44 pm |
| RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Wade Ebert | May 11, 2009, 1:15 pm |
| Hollywood | Ray | May 11, 2009, 12:21 pm |
| RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Hollywood | May 11, 2009, 12:16 pm |
| wow, actually proud of my employer! | shaking my head | May 11, 2009, 10:58 am |
| RE: Could we try to be a little more professional here? | Defender of Justice | May 7, 2009, 2:10 pm |
| Could we try to be a little more professional here? | fighting saints | May 6, 2009, 11:03 pm |
| RE: RE: No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 9:27 pm |
| RE: RE: Wait wait - Gill | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 9:16 pm |
| RE: RE: Wait wait - Gill | Silly Boy | May 6, 2009, 9:01 pm |
| RE: Wait wait - Gill | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 7:36 pm |
| Wait wait - Gill | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 7:10 pm |
| RE: simple solution | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 6:50 pm |
| RE: No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 5:54 pm |
| RE: simple solution | J Armstead | May 6, 2009, 5:33 pm |
| simple solution | caveat emptor | May 6, 2009, 5:02 pm |
| No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 5:00 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Mike Orton | May 6, 2009, 4:49 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 4:43 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 4:38 pm |
| RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 4:23 pm |
| You are correct Curious... | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 4:05 pm |
| RE: Aftermarket vs. OEM | Mike Orton | May 6, 2009, 3:47 pm |
| RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 3:44 pm |
| total cost of a car using oem | curious george | May 6, 2009, 3:41 pm |
| Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 3:38 pm |
| Aftermarket vs. OEM | Ray | May 6, 2009, 3:30 pm |
| RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 3:29 pm |
| RE: RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | J Armstead | May 6, 2009, 3:23 pm |
| RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | Scot Strong | May 6, 2009, 3:07 pm |
| To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 2:47 pm |
| RE: RE: Aftermarket Parts | Mike Orton | May 6, 2009, 2:46 pm |
| Aftermarket Parts | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 1:59 pm |
| RE: Aftermarket Parts | No SF Fan | May 6, 2009, 1:46 pm |
| RE: RE: Aftermarket Parts | Ray | May 6, 2009, 1:40 pm |
| RE: Aftermarket Parts | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 1:07 pm |
| Aftermarket Parts | MIKE MATTSON | May 6, 2009, 12:43 pm |
| precedence | curious george | May 6, 2009, 12:16 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade!
Just ask the State Farm policyholders who now have to accept non-loggo'd (Chinese crap) automotive glass as replacement glass for their damaged windshields. Will they receive a rate reduction when the cost of their policies were based upon OEM glass? No, not ever.
The insurance industry is a continuing criminal enterprise exempt from any real scrutiny and it will remain that way until consumers force them to sell products that are worth the paper they are printed on.
This "insurance journal" site is a joke with regard to understanding any real indemnification that was sold as bait and then switched at the time of a claim.