Midwest News
Viewing comments for:
$17M Jury Award Against American Family Mutual Reinstated
Midwest News May 6, 2009
A Missouri appeals court has reinstated a $17 million jury award in a class action lawsuit against American Family Mutual Insurance Co. over aftermarket vehicle parts.
The Missouri Court of ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: wow, actually proud of my employer! | Dave | Oct 26, 2009, 1:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Wade Ebert | May 12, 2009, 9:17 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | hollywood | May 11, 2009, 9:39 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Wade Ebert | May 11, 2009, 2:39 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Defender of Justice | May 11, 2009, 2:25 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | hollywood | May 11, 2009, 1:44 pm |
| RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Wade Ebert | May 11, 2009, 1:15 pm |
| Hollywood | Ray | May 11, 2009, 12:21 pm |
| RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Hollywood | May 11, 2009, 12:16 pm |
| wow, actually proud of my employer! | shaking my head | May 11, 2009, 10:58 am |
| RE: Could we try to be a little more professional here? | Defender of Justice | May 7, 2009, 2:10 pm |
| Could we try to be a little more professional here? | fighting saints | May 6, 2009, 11:03 pm |
| RE: RE: No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 9:27 pm |
| RE: RE: Wait wait - Gill | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 9:16 pm |
| RE: RE: Wait wait - Gill | Silly Boy | May 6, 2009, 9:01 pm |
| RE: Wait wait - Gill | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 7:36 pm |
| Wait wait - Gill | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 7:10 pm |
| RE: simple solution | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 6:50 pm |
| RE: No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 5:54 pm |
| RE: simple solution | J Armstead | May 6, 2009, 5:33 pm |
| simple solution | caveat emptor | May 6, 2009, 5:02 pm |
| No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 5:00 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Mike Orton | May 6, 2009, 4:49 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 4:43 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 4:38 pm |
| RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 4:23 pm |
| You are correct Curious... | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 4:05 pm |
| RE: Aftermarket vs. OEM | Mike Orton | May 6, 2009, 3:47 pm |
| RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 3:44 pm |
| total cost of a car using oem | curious george | May 6, 2009, 3:41 pm |
| Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 3:38 pm |
| Aftermarket vs. OEM | Ray | May 6, 2009, 3:30 pm |
| RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 3:29 pm |
| RE: RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | J Armstead | May 6, 2009, 3:23 pm |
| RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | Scot Strong | May 6, 2009, 3:07 pm |
| To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 2:47 pm |
| RE: RE: Aftermarket Parts | Mike Orton | May 6, 2009, 2:46 pm |
| Aftermarket Parts | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 1:59 pm |
| RE: Aftermarket Parts | No SF Fan | May 6, 2009, 1:46 pm |
| RE: RE: Aftermarket Parts | Ray | May 6, 2009, 1:40 pm |
| RE: Aftermarket Parts | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 1:07 pm |
| Aftermarket Parts | MIKE MATTSON | May 6, 2009, 12:43 pm |
| precedence | curious george | May 6, 2009, 12:16 pm |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade!
Yup. Fraud for Profit, Theft by Deception, Larceny by Trick. It has become institutionalized. Just like the Contingent Commissions, Credit Default Swaps and Title Washing to which insurance companies are apparently serially prone.
In this case - the intentional misrepresentation of the condition or quality of goods as something they are not.
Let's forget "good" versus "bad" and make it more simple. The parts are different. As in "not the same". Yet they are "sold" as "the same" and sometimes even "better than". It is a lie.
No amount of words can make them the same, nor make calling them the same - not a lie.
To quote my favorite Republican:
"How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg."
- A. Lincoln