Home > Talkback
Midwest News

Viewing comments for:

$17M Jury Award Against American Family Mutual Reinstated

Midwest News • May 6, 2009
A Missouri appeals court has reinstated a $17 million jury award in a class action lawsuit against American Family Mutual Insurance Co. over aftermarket vehicle parts. The Missouri Court of ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: You are correct Curious...

Posted On: May 6, 2009, 4:05 pm CDT
Posted By: Mark Pierson
Comment:
and if you replace the only parts available aftermarket available for that vehicle... a wavvy bumper cover and poorly stamped fender... you could shave about $200.00 off that $75K! Of course the obvious distortions in those parts would negate those BIG savings, but NAII and PCI loved to pick a vehicle every year and tout out these examples. Even Bob Hurn at PCI was thought this exercise was a weak argument, but I have not seen it done for a few years.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: wow, actually proud of my employer! Dave
Oct 26, 2009, 1:08 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert Wade Ebert
May 12, 2009, 9:17 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert hollywood
May 11, 2009, 9:39 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert Wade Ebert
May 11, 2009, 2:39 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert Defender of Justice
May 11, 2009, 2:25 pm
RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert hollywood
May 11, 2009, 1:44 pm
RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert Wade Ebert
May 11, 2009, 1:15 pm
Hollywood Ray
May 11, 2009, 12:21 pm
RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert Hollywood
May 11, 2009, 12:16 pm
wow, actually proud of my employer! shaking my head
May 11, 2009, 10:58 am
RE: Could we try to be a little more professional here? Defender of Justice
May 7, 2009, 2:10 pm
Could we try to be a little more professional here? fighting saints
May 6, 2009, 11:03 pm
RE: RE: No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG Mark Pierson
May 6, 2009, 9:27 pm
RE: RE: Wait wait - Gill Wade Ebert
May 6, 2009, 9:16 pm
RE: RE: Wait wait - Gill Silly Boy
May 6, 2009, 9:01 pm
RE: Wait wait - Gill Gill Fin
May 6, 2009, 7:36 pm
Wait wait - Gill Wade Ebert
May 6, 2009, 7:10 pm
RE: simple solution Wade Ebert
May 6, 2009, 6:50 pm
RE: No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG Gill Fin
May 6, 2009, 5:54 pm
RE: simple solution J Armstead
May 6, 2009, 5:33 pm
simple solution caveat emptor
May 6, 2009, 5:02 pm
No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG Wade Ebert
May 6, 2009, 5:00 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... Mike Orton
May 6, 2009, 4:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... Gill Fin
May 6, 2009, 4:43 pm
RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... Gill Fin
May 6, 2009, 4:38 pm
RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... Mark Pierson
May 6, 2009, 4:23 pm
You are correct Curious... Mark Pierson
May 6, 2009, 4:05 pm
RE: Aftermarket vs. OEM Mike Orton
May 6, 2009, 3:47 pm
RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... Gill Fin
May 6, 2009, 3:44 pm
total cost of a car using oem curious george
May 6, 2009, 3:41 pm
Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... Mark Pierson
May 6, 2009, 3:38 pm
Aftermarket vs. OEM Ray
May 6, 2009, 3:30 pm
RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! Wade Ebert
May 6, 2009, 3:29 pm
RE: RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! J Armstead
May 6, 2009, 3:23 pm
RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! Scot Strong
May 6, 2009, 3:07 pm
To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! Gill Fin
May 6, 2009, 2:47 pm
RE: RE: Aftermarket Parts Mike Orton
May 6, 2009, 2:46 pm
Aftermarket Parts Wade Ebert
May 6, 2009, 1:59 pm
RE: Aftermarket Parts No SF Fan
May 6, 2009, 1:46 pm
RE: RE: Aftermarket Parts Ray
May 6, 2009, 1:40 pm
RE: Aftermarket Parts Gill Fin
May 6, 2009, 1:07 pm
Aftermarket Parts MIKE MATTSON
May 6, 2009, 12:43 pm
precedence curious george
May 6, 2009, 12:16 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.