Midwest News
Viewing comments for:
$17M Jury Award Against American Family Mutual Reinstated
Midwest News May 6, 2009
A Missouri appeals court has reinstated a $17 million jury award in a class action lawsuit against American Family Mutual Insurance Co. over aftermarket vehicle parts.
The Missouri Court of ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: wow, actually proud of my employer! | Dave | Oct 26, 2009, 1:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Wade Ebert | May 12, 2009, 9:17 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | hollywood | May 11, 2009, 9:39 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Wade Ebert | May 11, 2009, 2:39 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Defender of Justice | May 11, 2009, 2:25 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | hollywood | May 11, 2009, 1:44 pm |
| RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Wade Ebert | May 11, 2009, 1:15 pm |
| Hollywood | Ray | May 11, 2009, 12:21 pm |
| RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert | Hollywood | May 11, 2009, 12:16 pm |
| wow, actually proud of my employer! | shaking my head | May 11, 2009, 10:58 am |
| RE: Could we try to be a little more professional here? | Defender of Justice | May 7, 2009, 2:10 pm |
| Could we try to be a little more professional here? | fighting saints | May 6, 2009, 11:03 pm |
| RE: RE: No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 9:27 pm |
| RE: RE: Wait wait - Gill | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 9:16 pm |
| RE: RE: Wait wait - Gill | Silly Boy | May 6, 2009, 9:01 pm |
| RE: Wait wait - Gill | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 7:36 pm |
| Wait wait - Gill | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 7:10 pm |
| RE: simple solution | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 6:50 pm |
| RE: No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 5:54 pm |
| RE: simple solution | J Armstead | May 6, 2009, 5:33 pm |
| simple solution | caveat emptor | May 6, 2009, 5:02 pm |
| No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 5:00 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Mike Orton | May 6, 2009, 4:49 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 4:43 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 4:38 pm |
| RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 4:23 pm |
| You are correct Curious... | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 4:05 pm |
| RE: Aftermarket vs. OEM | Mike Orton | May 6, 2009, 3:47 pm |
| RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 3:44 pm |
| total cost of a car using oem | curious george | May 6, 2009, 3:41 pm |
| Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... | Mark Pierson | May 6, 2009, 3:38 pm |
| Aftermarket vs. OEM | Ray | May 6, 2009, 3:30 pm |
| RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 3:29 pm |
| RE: RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | J Armstead | May 6, 2009, 3:23 pm |
| RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | Scot Strong | May 6, 2009, 3:07 pm |
| To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 2:47 pm |
| RE: RE: Aftermarket Parts | Mike Orton | May 6, 2009, 2:46 pm |
| Aftermarket Parts | Wade Ebert | May 6, 2009, 1:59 pm |
| RE: Aftermarket Parts | No SF Fan | May 6, 2009, 1:46 pm |
| RE: RE: Aftermarket Parts | Ray | May 6, 2009, 1:40 pm |
| RE: Aftermarket Parts | Gill Fin | May 6, 2009, 1:07 pm |
| Aftermarket Parts | MIKE MATTSON | May 6, 2009, 12:43 pm |
| precedence | curious george | May 6, 2009, 12:16 pm |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: Could we try to be a little more professional here?
I've been in claims for 23 yrs (both company and independent adjuster) and this subject has caused tons of issues for as long as I can remember. I have used OEM, used OEM and a/m parts on my personal vehicles, kids cars and our adjusting company cars. I have had to return some OEM, used and a/m because they were crap. Our appraisers prefer using used OEM parts to a/m because it is easier for the car owner to accept used OEM than a/m. If we pay for an a/m part and it sucks it doesn't get used. Same goes with OEM and used OEM. Our appraisers are former body shop owners and they will reinspect ANY part that the shop has issues with. Some are legit complaints, some are not. We're in a small town of about 15K so odds are you will run across the body shop and car owner again. Communication with both the shop and the car owner is the key. Most, but not all, car owners understand why they aren't owed a brand new OEM fender on their 2002 Taurus and that a/m or used OEM is in order. As independent adjusters we have only had 1 client company refuse to make good on an a/m part when it sucked.