Midwest News

Viewing comments for:

$17M Jury Award Against American Family Mutual Reinstated

Midwest News • May 6, 2009
A Missouri appeals court has reinstated a $17 million jury award in a class action lawsuit against American Family Mutual Insurance Co. over aftermarket vehicle parts. The Missouri Court of ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: Could we try to be a little more professional here?

Posted On: May 7, 2009, 2:10 pm CDT
Posted By: Defender of Justice
Comment:
Fighting Saints, I respect your opinion regarding the quality or lack thereof for OEM, salvage as well as aftermarket parts. However, what you failed to mention is that the salvage or aftermarket parts have a tremendous amount of returns versus the OEM for various reasons (fit, quality, craftsmanship, etc...).

I have been told by many adjusters time and time again, "get the aftermarket (or salvage) part in and if it isn't any good, then order an OEM and we will supplement it".

What is wrong with that? I will tell you. First off, they usually will not pay to prefit an aftermaket part. Who wants to cut a fender in only to find it doesn't fit properly? Secondly, now that the part is no good, you have to take more time out of your day to order an OEM part. This will then delay the repairs as you will now have to wait for the part. The customer may get upset by this. The shop will now be delayed in getting the vehicle out the door and thus resulting in delaying the start of another vehicle repair. Will the insurance pay for that? Not a chance. Have any of you ever had a vendor (aftermarket or salvage) refuse to sell you parts because you return too many parts? It has happened here.

So tell me again, why is using aftermarket parts or salvage parts the right thing to do? It isn't, plain and simple. No one wins with aftermarket or salvage parts except those parts vendors and the insurance company, certainly not the repair facility or customer.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: wow, actually proud of my employer! Dave
Oct 26, 2009, 1:08 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert Wade Ebert
May 12, 2009, 9:17 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert hollywood
May 11, 2009, 9:39 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert Wade Ebert
May 11, 2009, 2:39 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert Defender of Justice
May 11, 2009, 2:25 pm
RE: RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert hollywood
May 11, 2009, 1:44 pm
RE: RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert Wade Ebert
May 11, 2009, 1:15 pm
Hollywood Ray
May 11, 2009, 12:21 pm
RE: Mike Orton, Mark Pierson, Wade Ebert Hollywood
May 11, 2009, 12:16 pm
wow, actually proud of my employer! shaking my head
May 11, 2009, 10:58 am
RE: Could we try to be a little more professional here? Defender of Justice
May 7, 2009, 2:10 pm
Could we try to be a little more professional here? fighting saints
May 6, 2009, 11:03 pm
RE: RE: No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG Mark Pierson
May 6, 2009, 9:27 pm
RE: RE: Wait wait - Gill Wade Ebert
May 6, 2009, 9:16 pm
RE: RE: Wait wait - Gill Silly Boy
May 6, 2009, 9:01 pm
RE: Wait wait - Gill Gill Fin
May 6, 2009, 7:36 pm
Wait wait - Gill Wade Ebert
May 6, 2009, 7:10 pm
RE: simple solution Wade Ebert
May 6, 2009, 6:50 pm
RE: No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG Gill Fin
May 6, 2009, 5:54 pm
RE: simple solution J Armstead
May 6, 2009, 5:33 pm
simple solution caveat emptor
May 6, 2009, 5:02 pm
No offense Gill but my guess is that your AG Wade Ebert
May 6, 2009, 5:00 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... Mike Orton
May 6, 2009, 4:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... Gill Fin
May 6, 2009, 4:43 pm
RE: RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... Gill Fin
May 6, 2009, 4:38 pm
RE: RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... Mark Pierson
May 6, 2009, 4:23 pm
You are correct Curious... Mark Pierson
May 6, 2009, 4:05 pm
RE: Aftermarket vs. OEM Mike Orton
May 6, 2009, 3:47 pm
RE: Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... Gill Fin
May 6, 2009, 3:44 pm
total cost of a car using oem curious george
May 6, 2009, 3:41 pm
Come on Gill! Stop the Dance... Mark Pierson
May 6, 2009, 3:38 pm
Aftermarket vs. OEM Ray
May 6, 2009, 3:30 pm
RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! Wade Ebert
May 6, 2009, 3:29 pm
RE: RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! J Armstead
May 6, 2009, 3:23 pm
RE: To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! Scot Strong
May 6, 2009, 3:07 pm
To provide less to insured is fraud? Come on Wade! Gill Fin
May 6, 2009, 2:47 pm
RE: RE: Aftermarket Parts Mike Orton
May 6, 2009, 2:46 pm
Aftermarket Parts Wade Ebert
May 6, 2009, 1:59 pm
RE: Aftermarket Parts No SF Fan
May 6, 2009, 1:46 pm
RE: RE: Aftermarket Parts Ray
May 6, 2009, 1:40 pm
RE: Aftermarket Parts Gill Fin
May 6, 2009, 1:07 pm
Aftermarket Parts MIKE MATTSON
May 6, 2009, 12:43 pm
precedence curious george
May 6, 2009, 12:16 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.